Mailman School of Public Health and Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Global Doctors for Choice, New York, NY, USA, Accra, Ghana.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143 Suppl 4(Suppl Suppl 4):25-30. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12674.
In the first years of the new century, the Ministry of Health/Ghana Health Service determined to reduce abortion-associated morbidity and mortality by increasing access to safe care. This was accomplished by interpreting Ghana's restrictive law so that more women qualified for legal services; by framing this effort in public health terms; by bundling abortion together with contraception and postabortion care in a comprehensive package of services; and by training new cadres of health workers to provide manual vacuum aspiration and medical abortion. The Ministry of Health/Ghana Health Service convened medical and midwifery societies, nongovernmental organizations, and bilateral agencies to implement this plan, while retaining the leadership role. However, because of provider shortages, aggravated by conscientious objection, and because many still do not understand when abortion can be legally provided, some women still resort to unsafe care. Nonetheless, Ghana provides an example of the critical role of political will in redressing harms from unsafe abortion.
在新世纪的头几年,加纳卫生部/加纳卫生服务部门决心通过增加获得安全护理的机会来降低与堕胎相关的发病率和死亡率。这是通过以下方式实现的:解释加纳的限制性法律,使更多妇女有资格获得合法服务;将这项工作纳入公共卫生范畴;将堕胎与避孕和堕胎后护理捆绑在一个综合服务包中;培训新的卫生工作者队伍,以提供手动真空抽吸和药物流产。卫生部/加纳卫生服务部门召集医学和助产协会、非政府组织和双边机构来实施这一计划,同时保留领导作用。然而,由于提供者短缺,加上出于良心拒绝对堕胎的限制,以及许多人仍然不了解何时可以合法提供堕胎,一些妇女仍然求助于不安全的护理。尽管如此,加纳为政治意愿在纠正不安全堕胎造成的伤害方面所发挥的关键作用提供了一个范例。