Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital, Japan.
Resuscitation. 2016 Nov;108:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Early rhythm conversion from an initial non-shockable to a shockable rhythm and subsequent shock delivery in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been associated with favourable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category score 1 or 2; CPC 1-2). We hypothesized that the prognostic significance of rhythm conversion and subsequent shock delivery differs by age and time from initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by emergency medical service (EMS) providers to first defibrillation (shock delivery time).
We analysed 430,443 OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm using a prospective Japanese Utstein-style database from 2011 to 2014. The primary endpoint was 1-month CPC 1-2.
Multivariate logistic regression revealed that rhythm conversion and subsequent shock delivery is positively associated with 1-month CPC 1-2: the adjusted odds ratio was 6.09 (95% confidence interval: 3.65-9.75) for shock delivery time <10min and 3.34 (2.58-4.27) for 10-19min in patients aged 18-64 years, and 3.16 (1.45-6.09) for <10min and 2.17 (1.51-3.03) for 10-19min in patients aged 65-74 years. However, it is negatively associated with 1-month CPC 1-2 for shock delivery time of 20-59min in patients aged 75-84 years (0.55; 0.27-0.98) and ≥85 years (0.17; 0.03-0.53).
Early rhythm conversion from an initial non-shockable to a shockable rhythm and subsequent shock delivery is associated with increased odds of 1-month CPC 1-2 in OHCA patients aged 18-74 years but not in those aged ≥75 years.
在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者中,从初始非颤动感应节律到可颤动感应节律的早期节律转换以及随后的电击除颤与良好的神经功能结局(脑功能预后分类评分 1 或 2;CPC 1-2)相关。我们假设,节律转换和随后电击除颤的预后意义因年龄以及急救医疗服务(EMS)提供者开始心肺复苏(CPR)至首次除颤(电击除颤时间)的时间而异。
我们分析了 2011 年至 2014 年期间,来自日本前瞻性 Utstein 风格数据库的 430,443 例初始非颤动感应节律的 OHCA 患者。主要终点为 1 个月 CPC 1-2。
多变量逻辑回归显示,节律转换和随后电击除颤与 1 个月 CPC 1-2 呈正相关:在 18-64 岁患者中,电击除颤时间<10min 和 10-19min 的校正比值比分别为 6.09(95%置信区间:3.65-9.75)和 3.34(2.58-4.27),在 65-74 岁患者中,<10min 和 10-19min 的校正比值比分别为 3.16(1.45-6.09)和 2.17(1.51-3.03)。然而,在 75-84 岁患者中,电击除颤时间为 20-59min (0.55;0.27-0.98)和≥85 岁患者(0.17;0.03-0.53)与 1 个月 CPC 1-2 呈负相关。
在 18-74 岁的 OHCA 患者中,从初始非颤动感应节律到可颤动感应节律的早期节律转换以及随后的电击除颤与 1 个月 CPC 1-2 的几率增加相关,但在≥75 岁的患者中则不然。