Lynch Gillian C, Perkyns John S, Nguyen Bao Linh, Pettitt B Montgomery
Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-0304, USA.
Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Pharmacology and Toxicology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-0304, USA.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 May;1850(5):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Solvation density locations are important for protein dynamics and structure. Knowledge of the preferred hydration sites at biomolecular interfaces and those in the interior of cavities can enhance understanding of structure and function. While advanced X-ray diffraction methods can provide accurate atomic structures for proteins, that technique is challenged when it comes to providing accurate hydration structures, especially for interfacial and cavity bound solvent molecules.
Advances in integral equation theories which include more accurate methods for calculating the long-ranged Coulomb interaction contributions to the three-dimensional distribution functions make it possible to calculate angle dependent average solvent structure, accurately, around and inside irregular molecular conformations. The proximal radial distribution method provides another approximate method to determine average solvent structures for biomolecular systems based on a proximal or near neighbor solvent distribution that can be constructed from previously collected solvent distributions. These two approximate methods, along with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations are used to determine the solvent density inside the myoglobin heme cavity.
Myoglobin is a good test system for these methods because the cavities are many and one is large, tens of Å(3), but is shown to have only four hydration sites. These sites are not near neighbors which implies that the large cavity must have more than one way in and out.
Our results show that main solvation sites are well reproduced by all three methods. The techniques also produce a clearly identifiable solvent pathway into the interior of the protein.
The agreement between molecular dynamics and less computationally demanding approximate methods is encouraging. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Recent developments of molecular dynamics.
溶剂化密度位置对于蛋白质动力学和结构很重要。了解生物分子界面以及腔体内的优先水合位点有助于增进对结构和功能的理解。虽然先进的X射线衍射方法可以为蛋白质提供精确的原子结构,但在提供精确的水合结构方面,尤其是对于界面和腔体内结合的溶剂分子,该技术面临挑战。
积分方程理论的进展,包括更精确的计算长程库仑相互作用对三维分布函数贡献的方法,使得能够准确计算不规则分子构象周围和内部与角度相关的平均溶剂结构。近端径向分布方法提供了另一种近似方法,可基于可以从先前收集的溶剂分布构建的近端或近邻溶剂分布来确定生物分子系统的平均溶剂结构。这两种近似方法与全原子分子动力学模拟一起用于确定肌红蛋白血红素腔内的溶剂密度。
肌红蛋白是这些方法的一个很好的测试系统,因为其腔体众多且有一个较大的腔体,体积达数十埃³,但结果显示只有四个水合位点。这些位点并非近邻,这意味着大腔体必定有不止一条进出通道。
我们的结果表明,所有三种方法都能很好地重现主要溶剂化位点。这些技术还产生了一条清晰可辨的进入蛋白质内部的溶剂通道。
分子动力学与计算要求较低的近似方法之间的一致性令人鼓舞。本文是名为“分子动力学的最新进展”的特刊的一部分。