Iachini Tina, Ruggiero Gennaro, Ruotolo Francesco, Vinciguerra Michela
Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Italy.
Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, Department of Psychology, Second University of Naples, Italy.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
The aim of this study was to explore the role of motor resources in peripersonal space encoding: are they intrinsic to spatial processes or due to action potentiality of objects? To answer this question, we disentangled the effects of motor resources on object manipulability and spatial processing in peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces. Participants had to localize manipulable and non-manipulable 3-D stimuli presented within peripersonal or extrapersonal spaces of an immersive virtual reality scenario. To assess the contribution of motor resources to the spatial task a motor interference paradigm was used. In Experiment 1, localization judgments were provided with the left hand while the right dominant arm could be free or blocked. Results showed that participants were faster and more accurate in localizing both manipulable and non-manipulable stimuli in peripersonal space with their arms free. On the other hand, in extrapersonal space there was no significant effect of motor interference. Experiment 2 replicated these results by using alternatively both hands to give the response and controlling the possible effect of the orientation of object handles. Overall, the pattern of results suggests that the encoding of peripersonal space involves motor processes per se, and not because of the presence of manipulable stimuli. It is argued that this motor grounding reflects the adaptive need of anticipating what may happen near the body and preparing to react in time.
它们是空间过程所固有的,还是由于物体的动作可能性?为了回答这个问题,我们区分了运动资源对个人周边空间和个人外部空间中物体可操作性和空间处理的影响。参与者必须对沉浸式虚拟现实场景的个人周边空间或个人外部空间中呈现的可操作和不可操作的三维刺激进行定位。为了评估运动资源对空间任务的贡献,我们使用了一种运动干扰范式。在实验1中,用左手进行定位判断,而右手优势臂可以自由或被阻挡。结果表明,当手臂自由时,参与者在个人周边空间中对可操作和不可操作刺激进行定位时更快、更准确。另一方面,在个人外部空间中,运动干扰没有显著影响。实验2通过交替使用双手给出反应并控制物体手柄方向的可能影响,重复了这些结果。总体而言,结果模式表明,个人周边空间的编码本身涉及运动过程,而不是因为存在可操作的刺激。有人认为,这种运动基础反映了预测身体附近可能发生的事情并及时准备做出反应的适应性需求。