• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

操控时间与空间:个人周边空间和个人外部空间中的碰撞预测

Manipulating time and space: Collision prediction in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.

作者信息

Iachini Tina, Ruotolo Francesco, Vinciguerra Michela, Ruggiero Gennaro

机构信息

Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Immersive Virtual Reality, CS-IVR, Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Italy.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 May 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.024
PMID:28554080
Abstract

Being able to predict potential collisions is a necessary survival prerequisite for all moving species. Temporal and spatial information is fundamental for this purpose. However, it is not clear yet if the peripersonal (i.e. near) and extrapersonal (i.e. far) distance between our body and the moving objects affects the way in which we can predict possible collisions. In order to assess this, we manipulated independently velocity and path of two balls moving one towards the other in such a way as to collide or not in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. In two experiments, participants had to judge if these balls were to collide or not. The results consistently showed a lower discrimination capacity and a more liberal tendency to predict collisions when the moving balls were in peripersonal space and their velocity was different rather than equal. This did not happen in extrapersonal space. Therefore, peripersonal space was particularly affected by temporal information. The possible link between the motor and anticipatory adaptive function of peripersonal space and collision prediction mechanisms is discussed.

摘要

能够预测潜在碰撞是所有移动物种生存的必要前提。为此,时间和空间信息至关重要。然而,我们身体与移动物体之间的个人周边(即近处)和个人外部(即远处)距离是否会影响我们预测可能碰撞的方式,目前尚不清楚。为了评估这一点,我们独立操纵两个相互靠近移动的球的速度和路径,使其在个人周边空间和个人外部空间发生碰撞或不发生碰撞。在两个实验中,参与者必须判断这些球是否会碰撞。结果一致表明,当移动的球处于个人周边空间且速度不同而非相等时,辨别能力较低,预测碰撞的倾向更为宽松。在个人外部空间则没有出现这种情况。因此,个人周边空间特别受时间信息的影响。本文讨论了个人周边空间的运动和预期适应功能与碰撞预测机制之间可能存在的联系。

相似文献

1
Manipulating time and space: Collision prediction in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.操控时间与空间:个人周边空间和个人外部空间中的碰撞预测
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 May 26.
2
The Effects of Optical Illusions in Perception and Action in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space.视错觉对个人空间和超个人空间中感知与行动的影响。
Perception. 2017 Sep;46(9):1118-1126. doi: 10.1177/0301006617707697. Epub 2017 May 3.
3
Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: evidence from motor interference.个人周边空间中的运动资源是空间编码所固有的:来自运动干扰的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
4
Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.忽视症中的检测梯度:个人周边空间与个人外部空间的比较
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(3):346-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.008.
5
How tool use and arm position affect peripersonal space representation.工具使用和手臂位置如何影响个人周边空间表征。
Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S325-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0458-8.
6
Peripersonal versus extrapersonal visual scene information for egocentric direction and position perception.用于自我中心方向和位置感知的个人空间与个人空间外视觉场景信息
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 May;71(5):1090-1099. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310267. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
7
Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.棱镜适应对个人周边空间和个人外部空间中空间范围判断的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(4):493-503. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00090-8.
8
Female advantage for object location memory in peripersonal but not extrapersonal space.在个人空间附近而非个人空间之外的空间中,女性在物体位置记忆方面具有优势。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Jul;13(4):683-6. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707070865. Epub 2007 May 18.
9
Social scaling of extrapersonal space: target objects are judged as closer when the reference frame is a human agent with available movement potentialities.个人空间之外的社会尺度:当参照系是具有潜在移动能力的人类主体时,目标物体被判断为更近。
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
10
Spatial dependency of action simulation.动作模拟的空间依赖性。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Aug;212(4):635-44. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2748-2. Epub 2011 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal mechanisms underlying visual processing bias in peri-hand space.手部周围空间视觉处理偏差的时间机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2659-2671. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02980-w. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Spatial memory and frames of reference: How deeply do we rely on the body and the environment?空间记忆和参照系:我们在多大程度上依赖于身体和环境?
Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(Suppl 1):79-83. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01211-2. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
3
The Interrelation Between Peripersonal Action Space and Interpersonal Social Space: Psychophysiological Evidence and Clinical Implications.
个人周边行动空间与人际社会空间之间的相互关系:心理生理学证据及临床意义
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Feb 26;15:636124. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.636124. eCollection 2021.
4
Defensive functions provoke similar psychophysiological reactions in reaching and comfort spaces.防御功能在触及空间和舒适空间中引发相似的身心反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83988-2.
5
Can I put myself in your shoes? Sharing peripersonal space reveals the simulation of the action possibilities of others.我能设身处地为你着想吗?共享共感空间揭示了对他人行为可能性的模拟。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar;239(3):1035-1045. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06040-9. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Frontier of Self and Impact Prediction.自我与影响预测前沿
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 27;9:1073. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01073. eCollection 2018.
7
Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context.对个人空间内面部表情的生理反应决定了社交互动情境中的人际距离。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 7;9:657. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657. eCollection 2018.