Field Kathryn M, Jordan Justin T, Wen Patrick Y, Rosenthal Mark A, Reardon David A
Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):997-1007. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28935. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
Anti-angiogenic therapy for glioblastoma has been in the spotlight for several years, as researchers and clinicians strive to find agents with meaningful efficacy against glioblastoma. Bevacizumab in particular, in the second half of the last decade, became the most significant breakthrough in anti-glioblastoma therapy since temozolomide. Optimism for bevacizumab has been somewhat challenged given recent clinical trials that have raised questions regarding its clinical effectiveness, the optimal timing of its use and the validity of endpoints, among other issues. In addition, uncertainty has recently arisen regarding the effects of bevacizumab on quality of life and neurocognitive function, two key clinical endpoints of unquestionable significance among glioblastoma patients. In this review, we highlight these controversies and other recent work related to bevacizumab for glioblastoma.
胶质母细胞瘤的抗血管生成治疗已经成为焦点数年,因为研究人员和临床医生努力寻找对胶质母细胞瘤有显著疗效的药物。特别是贝伐单抗,在上个十年的后半期,成为自替莫唑胺以来抗胶质母细胞瘤治疗中最重大的突破。鉴于最近的临床试验对其临床有效性、使用的最佳时机以及终点的有效性等问题提出了质疑,对贝伐单抗的乐观态度受到了一定挑战。此外,最近关于贝伐单抗对生活质量和神经认知功能的影响出现了不确定性,这是胶质母细胞瘤患者中两个具有无可争议重要性的关键临床终点。在本综述中,我们强调这些争议以及最近与贝伐单抗治疗胶质母细胞瘤相关的其他工作。