• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小学科学思维的发展:一份综合清单。

The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: a comprehensive inventory.

作者信息

Koerber Susanne, Mayer Daniela, Osterhaus Christopher, Schwippert Knut, Sodian Beate

机构信息

Freiburg University of Education.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):327-36. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12298. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12298
PMID:25263396
Abstract

The development of scientific thinking was assessed in 1,581 second, third, and fourth graders (8-, 9-, 10-year-olds) based on a conceptual model that posits developmental progression from naïve to more advanced conceptions. Using a 66-item scale, five components of scientific thinking were addressed, including experimental design, data interpretation, and understanding the nature of science. Unidimensional and multidimensional item response theory analyses supported the instrument's reliability and validity and suggested that the multiple components of scientific thinking form a unitary construct, independent of verbal or reasoning skills. A partial credit model gave evidence for a hierarchical developmental progression. Across each grade transition, advanced conceptions increased while naïve conceptions decreased. Independent effects of intelligence, schooling, and parental education on scientific thinking are discussed.

摘要

基于一个假定从幼稚到更高级概念发展进程的概念模型,对1581名二、三、四年级学生(8、9、10岁)的科学思维发展进行了评估。使用一个包含66个条目的量表,探讨了科学思维的五个组成部分,包括实验设计、数据解释以及对科学本质的理解。单维和多维项目反应理论分析支持了该工具的信效度,并表明科学思维的多个组成部分构成一个单一结构,独立于语言或推理技能。一个部分计分模型为分层发展进程提供了证据。在每个年级过渡阶段,高级概念增加而幼稚概念减少。还讨论了智力、学校教育和父母教育对科学思维的独立影响。

相似文献

1
The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: a comprehensive inventory.小学科学思维的发展:一份综合清单。
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):327-36. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12298. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
2
Testing primary-school children's understanding of the nature of science.测试小学生对科学本质的理解。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;33(1):57-72. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12067. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
3
Scaling of Advanced Theory-of-Mind Tasks.高级心理理论任务的量表编制
Child Dev. 2016 Nov;87(6):1971-1991. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12566. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
4
Scientific thinking in elementary school: Children's social cognition and their epistemological understanding promote experimentation skills.小学阶段的科学思维:儿童的社会认知及其认识论理解促进实验技能。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Mar;53(3):450-462. doi: 10.1037/dev0000260. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
5
Scientific reasoning in early and middle childhood: the development of domain-general evidence evaluation, experimentation, and hypothesis generation skills.儿童早期和中期的科学推理:领域一般性证据评估、实验和假设生成技能的发展。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;31(Pt 2):153-79. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02082.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
6
Constructing the Children's Future Thinking Questionnaire: A reliable and valid measure of children's future-oriented cognition.构建儿童未来思维问卷:一种可靠且有效的儿童未来导向认知测量工具。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Apr;56(4):756-772. doi: 10.1037/dev0000885. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Factorial structure of the 'ToM Storybooks': A test evaluating multiple components of Theory of Mind.“心理理论故事书”的因子结构:一项评估心理理论多个组成部分的测试。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2015 Jun;33(2):187-202. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12062. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
8
Children's science learning: A core skills approach.儿童科学学习:一种核心技能方法。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Sep;86(3):481-97. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12119. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Assessment of pretend play in preschool-aged children: validation and factor analysis of the affect in play scale-preschool version.评估学龄前儿童的假装游戏:游戏量表-学龄前版的影响的验证和因子分析。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(3):350-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.838171. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
10
The Nature of Science Instrument-Elementary (NOSI-E): the end of the road?科学本质基础仪器(NOSI-E):路的尽头?
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(4):338-58.

引用本文的文献

1
When children can explain why they believe a claim, they suggest a better empirical test for that claim.当孩子们能够解释他们为什么相信某一说法时,他们会为该说法提出一个更好的实证检验方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 11;11(12):241875. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241875. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Epistemic Beliefs in Science-A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies.科学中的认知信念——来自多项研究的证据的系统整合
Educ Psychol Rev. 2022;34(3):1541-1575. doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
3
The Predictive Value of Children's Understanding of Indeterminacy and Confounding for Later Mastery of the Control-of-Variables Strategy.
儿童对不确定性和混淆因素的理解对后期掌握变量控制策略的预测价值。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 1;11:531565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531565. eCollection 2020.
4
Of Blickets, Butterflies, and Baby Dinosaurs: Children's Diagnostic Reasoning Across Domains.小积木、蝴蝶与恐龙宝宝:儿童跨领域的诊断推理
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 25;11:2210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02210. eCollection 2020.
5
Theory of Mind, Personal Epistemology, and Science Learning: Exploring Common Conceptual Components.心理理论、个人认识论与科学学习:探索共同的概念组成部分。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1140. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01140. eCollection 2020.
6
Individual Differences in Children's Development of Scientific Reasoning Through Inquiry-Based Instruction: Who Needs Additional Guidance?通过探究式教学培养儿童科学推理能力的个体差异:谁需要额外指导?
Front Psychol. 2020 May 14;11:904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00904. eCollection 2020.
7
Editorial: Novel Approaches to Teaching Scientific Thinking: Psychological Perspectives.社论:科学思维教学的新方法:心理学视角
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00820. eCollection 2017.
8
Redefining Critical Thinking: Teaching Students to Think like Scientists.重新定义批判性思维:教导学生像科学家一样思考。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 29;8:459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00459. eCollection 2017.