Suppr超能文献

颈部解剖“分区”在穿透性颈部损伤评估中的应用。

The use of the anatomic 'zones' of the neck in the assessment of penetrating neck injury.

作者信息

Low Garren M I, Inaba Kenji, Chouliaras Konstantinos, Branco Bernardino, Lam Lydia, Benjamin Elizabeth, Menaker Jay, Demetriades Demetrios

机构信息

LAC+USC Medical Center, Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2014 Oct;80(10):970-4.

Abstract

The traditional classification of neck injuries uses an anatomic description of Zones I through III. The objective of this article was to characterize the association between external wounds and the corresponding internal injuries after penetrating neck trauma to identify the clinical use of the anatomic zones of the neck. Patients who sustained penetrating neck trauma from December 2008 to March 2011 were analyzed. All patients underwent structured clinical examination documenting the external zone where the wound(s) were located. All internal injuries were then correlated with the external wounds. An internal injury was defined as "unexpected" if it was located outside the borders of the neck zone corresponding to the external wound. In total, 146 patients sustaining a penetrating neck injury were analyzed; 126 (86%) male. The mechanism of injury was stab wounds in 74 (51%) and gunshot wounds in 69 (47%). Mean age was 31 years (range, nine to 62 years). Thirty-seven (25%) patients sustained had a total of 50 internal injuries. There was a high incidence of noncorrelation between the location of the external injury and the internal structures that were damaged in patients with hard signs of vascular or aerodigestive injury. The use of the anatomic zones and their role in the workup of penetrating neck injury are questionable.

摘要

颈部损伤的传统分类采用I至III区的解剖学描述。本文的目的是描述穿透性颈部创伤后外部伤口与相应内部损伤之间的关联,以确定颈部解剖区域的临床应用。对2008年12月至2011年3月期间遭受穿透性颈部创伤的患者进行了分析。所有患者均接受了结构化临床检查,记录伤口所在的外部区域。然后将所有内部损伤与外部伤口进行关联。如果内部损伤位于与外部伤口相对应的颈部区域边界之外,则定义为“意外”损伤。总共分析了146例遭受穿透性颈部损伤的患者;其中126例(86%)为男性。损伤机制为刺伤74例(51%),枪伤69例(47%)。平均年龄为31岁(范围为9至62岁)。37例(25%)患者共有50处内部损伤。在有血管或气消化道损伤硬体征的患者中,外部损伤部位与受损内部结构之间存在不相关的高发生率。颈部解剖区域的使用及其在穿透性颈部损伤检查中的作用值得怀疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验