Suppr超能文献

使用和不使用不稳定装置进行平板支撑变体动作时的肌电图比较。

Electromyographical comparison of plank variations performed with and without instability devices.

作者信息

Snarr Ronald L, Esco Michael R

机构信息

1Department of Kinesiology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and 2Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Exercise Science, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, Alabama.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):3298-305. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000521.

Abstract

Although there are multiple studies involving abdominal musculature activation and instability devices (e.g., Swiss balls), there is minimal research comparing them with a suspension device (e.g., TRX). The purpose of this investigation was to measure the electromyographical (EMG) activity of the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), and erector spinae while performing planks with and without multiple instability devices. Twelve apparently healthy men (n = 6; age = 23.92 ± 3.64 years) and women (n = 6; age = 22.57 ± 1.87 years) volunteered to participate in this study. All participants performed 2 isometric contractions of 5 different plank variations, with or without an instability device, where the order of the exercises was randomized. Mean peak and normalized EMG of the RA, EO, and erector spinae musculature were compared across the 5 exercises. Results indicated that planks performed with the instability devices increased EMG activity in the superficial musculature when compared with traditional stable planks. Therefore, a traditional plank performed on a labile device may be considered an advanced variation and appropriate for use when a greater challenge is warranted. However, caution should be taken for those individuals with a history or weakness in the lumbar region due to the increases in erector spinae activation during instability planks.

摘要

尽管有多项研究涉及腹部肌肉激活和不稳定训练器械(如瑞士球),但将它们与悬吊训练器械(如TRX)进行比较的研究却很少。本研究的目的是测量在使用和不使用多种不稳定训练器械进行平板支撑时,腹直肌(RA)、腹外斜肌(EO)和竖脊肌的肌电图(EMG)活动。12名明显健康的男性(n = 6;年龄 = 23.92 ± 3.64岁)和女性(n = 6;年龄 = 22.57 ± 1.87岁)自愿参与本研究。所有参与者对5种不同的平板支撑变式进行了2次等长收缩,使用或不使用不稳定训练器械,练习顺序随机。比较了5种练习中RA、EO和竖脊肌的平均峰值和标准化EMG。结果表明,与传统的稳定平板支撑相比,使用不稳定训练器械进行的平板支撑增加了表层肌肉的EMG活动。因此,在不稳定器械上进行的传统平板支撑可被视为一种进阶变式,适用于需要更大挑战的情况。然而,对于有腰部病史或腰部力量较弱的个体,由于不稳定平板支撑期间竖脊肌激活增加,应谨慎使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验