Suppr超能文献

高质量糖尿病常规护理的组织决定因素。

Organizational determinants of high-quality routine diabetes care.

作者信息

van Doorn-Klomberg Arna L, Braspenning Jozé C C, Wolters René J, Bouma Margriet, de Grauw Wim J C, Wensing Michel

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Sep;32(3):124-31. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2014.960252. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Randomized trials showed that changes in healthcare organization improved diabetes care. This study aimed to identify which organizational determinants were associated with patient outcomes in routine diabetes care.

DESIGN

Observational study, in which multilevel regression analyses were applied to examine the impact of 12 organizational determinants on diabetes care as separate measures and as a composite score.

SETTING

Primary care practices in the Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

11,751 patients with diabetes in 354 practices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' recorded glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure, and serum cholesterol levels.

RESULTS

A higher score on the composite measure of organizational determinants was associated with better control of systolic blood pressure (p = 0.017). No effects on HbA1C or cholesterol levels were found. Exploration of specific organizational factors found significant impact of use of an electronic patient registry on HbA1c (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.12-2.88), availability of patient leaflets on systolic blood pressure control (OR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.06-6.35), and number of hours' nurse education on cholesterol control (OR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.02-6.15).

CONCLUSION

In routine primary care, it was found that favorable healthcare organization was associated with a number of intermediate outcomes in diabetes care. This finding lends support to the findings of trials on organizational changes in diabetes care. Notably, the composite measure of organizational determinants had most impact.

摘要

目的

随机试验表明,医疗保健组织的变革改善了糖尿病护理。本研究旨在确定在常规糖尿病护理中,哪些组织决定因素与患者预后相关。

设计

观察性研究,应用多水平回归分析来检验12个组织决定因素作为单独指标以及综合评分对糖尿病护理的影响。

地点

荷兰的基层医疗诊所。

研究对象

354家诊所的11751例糖尿病患者。

主要观察指标

患者记录的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、收缩压和血清胆固醇水平。

结果

组织决定因素综合指标得分越高,收缩压控制越好(p = 0.017)。未发现对HbA1c或胆固醇水平有影响。对特定组织因素的探索发现,使用电子患者登记系统对HbA1c有显著影响(OR = 1.80,95%CI 1.12 - 2.88),提供患者手册对收缩压控制有影响(OR = 2.59,95%CI 1.06 - 6.35),护士接受胆固醇控制教育的时长对胆固醇控制有影响(OR = 2.51,95%CI 1.02 - 6.15)。

结论

在常规基层医疗中,发现良好的医疗保健组织与糖尿病护理中的一些中间结局相关。这一发现支持了糖尿病护理组织变革试验的结果。值得注意的是,组织决定因素的综合指标影响最大。

相似文献

1
Organizational determinants of high-quality routine diabetes care.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Sep;32(3):124-31. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2014.960252. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
4
Health care delivery in type 2 diabetes. A survey in an Italian primary care practice.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Feb;9(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
6
Improving diabetes care at primary care level with a multistrategic approach: results of the DIAPREM programme.
Acta Diabetol. 2017 Sep;54(9):853-861. doi: 10.1007/s00592-017-1016-8. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
9
Quality of chronic kidney disease management in primary care: a retrospective study.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(1):73-80. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1132885. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Macroergonomic components of the patient work system shaping dyadic care management during adolescence: a case study of type 1 diabetes.
Ergonomics. 2024 Nov;67(11):1575-1595. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2343942. Epub 2024 May 7.
4
Implementation of selective prevention for cardiometabolic diseases; are Dutch general practices adequately prepared?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):20-27. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426151. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
5
Social disparities in diabetes care: a general population study in Denmark.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017 Mar;35(1):54-63. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2017.1288702. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
6
Financial Incentives and Diabetes Disease Control in Employees: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3686-2. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
7
Quality of chronic kidney disease management in primary care: a retrospective study.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(1):73-80. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1132885. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

5
Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2252-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
6
Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 1;365(9):825-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1102519.
10
Meaningful variation in performance: a systematic literature review.
Med Care. 2010 Feb;48(2):140-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd4dc3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验