• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病护理质量在患者、医生和诊所层面存在差异。

Variation in quality of diabetes care at the levels of patient, physician, and clinic.

作者信息

O'Connor Patrick J, Rush William A, Davidson Gestur, Louis Thomas A, Solberg Leif I, Crain Lauren, Johnson Paul E, Whitebird Robin R

机构信息

HealthPartners Research Foundation, 8100 34th Ave S, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A15. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

PMID:18082004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2248776/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We studied variance in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values among adults with diabetes to identify variation in quality of diabetes care at the levels of patient, physician, and clinic, and to identify which levels contribute the most to variation and which variables at each level are related to quality of diabetes care.

METHODS

Study subjects were 120 primary care physicians and their 2589 eligible adult patients with diabetes seen at 18 clinics. The dependent variable was HbA1c values recorded in clinical databases. Multivariate hierarchical models were used to partition variation in HbA1c values across the levels of patient, physician, or clinic and to identify significant predictors of HbA1c at each level.

RESULTS

More than 95% of variance in HbA1c values was attributable to the patient level. Much less variance was seen at the physician and clinic level. Inclusion of patient and physician covariates did not substantially change this pattern of results. Intensification of pharmacotherapy (t = -7.40, P < .01) and patient age (t = 2.10, P < .05) were related to favorable change in HbA1c. Physician age, physician specialty, number of diabetes patients per physician, patient comorbidity, and clinic assignment did not predict change in HbA1c value. The overall model with covariates explained 11.8% of change in HbA1c value over time.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that most variance in HbA1c values is attributable to patient factors, although physicians play a major role in some patient factors (e.g., intensification of medication). These findings may lead to more effective care-improvement strategies and accountability measures.

摘要

引言

我们研究了糖尿病成年患者糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)值的差异,以确定患者、医生和诊所层面糖尿病护理质量的变化,并确定哪些层面的差异最大,以及每个层面的哪些变量与糖尿病护理质量相关。

方法

研究对象为18家诊所的120名初级保健医生及其2589名符合条件的成年糖尿病患者。因变量是临床数据库中记录的HbA1c值。使用多变量层次模型来划分HbA1c值在患者、医生或诊所层面的差异,并确定每个层面HbA1c的显著预测因素。

结果

HbA1c值超过95%的差异可归因于患者层面。在医生和诊所层面观察到的差异要小得多。纳入患者和医生协变量并没有实质性改变这种结果模式。强化药物治疗(t = -7.40,P <.01)和患者年龄(t = 2.10,P <.05)与HbA1c的有利变化相关。医生年龄、医生专业、每位医生的糖尿病患者数量、患者合并症和诊所分配并不能预测HbA1c值的变化。带有协变量的总体模型解释了HbA1c值随时间变化的11.8%。

结论

这些数据表明,HbA1c值的大部分差异可归因于患者因素,尽管医生在某些患者因素(如强化药物治疗)中起主要作用。这些发现可能会带来更有效的护理改善策略和问责措施。

相似文献

1
Variation in quality of diabetes care at the levels of patient, physician, and clinic.糖尿病护理质量在患者、医生和诊所层面存在差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A15. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
2
The effect of advanced access implementation on quality of diabetes care.实施提前预约对糖尿病护理质量的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jan;5(1):A16. Epub 2007 Dec 15.
3
Validity of random blood glucose as a predictor of the quality of glycaemic control by glycated haemoglobin in out-patient diabetic patients at Kenyatta National Hospital.肯尼亚国家医院门诊糖尿病患者中随机血糖作为糖化血红蛋白血糖控制质量预测指标的有效性
East Afr Med J. 2002 Sep;79(9):491-5. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v79i9.9122.
4
Organizational determinants of high-quality routine diabetes care.高质量糖尿病常规护理的组织决定因素。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Sep;32(3):124-31. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2014.960252. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
5
Variation in Point-of-Care Testing of HbA1c in Diabetes Care in General Practice.在一般实践中糖尿病护理中即时 HbA1c 检测的变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 9;14(11):1363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111363.
6
Comparison of clinical pharmacy specialists and primary care physicians in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in rural Veterans Affairs facilities.农村退伍军人事务设施中临床药学专家与初级保健医生治疗2型糖尿病的比较。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Mar 1;75(5 Supplement 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160905.
7
Barriers to control of blood glucose in diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者血糖控制的障碍
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):16-25. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500104.
8
Patterns and trends in insulin intensification among patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.2型糖尿病患者胰岛素强化治疗的模式与趋势:一项系统综述
Prim Care Diabetes. 2014 Jul;8(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
9
Continuous quality improvement can improve glycemic control for HMO patients with diabetes.持续质量改进可以改善健康维护组织(HMO)中糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
Arch Fam Med. 1996 Oct;5(9):502-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.5.9.502.
10
Patient-Centered Guidelines for Geriatric Diabetes Care: Potential Missed Opportunities to Avoid Harm.以患者为中心的老年糖尿病护理指南:避免伤害的潜在错失机会。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):192-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There a Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review.除干预措施和所有已知因素外,医生对患者身体健康是否有影响?一项系统评价。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Jul 21;18:721-737. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S372464. eCollection 2022.
2
The Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health Outcomes Beyond the Intervention: A Methodological Review.医生对患者干预之外身体健康结局的影响:一项方法学综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 18;14:851-870. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S357927. eCollection 2022.
3
The Contribution of Patient, Primary Care Physician, and Primary Care Clinic Factors to Good Bone Health Care.患者、初级保健医生和初级保健诊所因素对良好的骨骼保健的贡献。
Perm J. 2021 Jan;25:1-3. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.095.
4
Clinic and patient variation in intermediate clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes: a multilevel analysis.2 型糖尿病中间临床结局的临床和患者差异:一项多层次分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 15;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1045-1.
5
Offering patients a choice for colorectal cancer screening: a quality improvement pilot study in a quality circle of primary care physicians.为患者提供结直肠癌筛查选择:一项针对基层医疗医生质量改进圈的试点研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Oct 3;8(4):e000670. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000670. eCollection 2019.
6
Influence of patient characteristics on preventive service delivery and general practitioners' preventive performance indicators: A study in patients with hypertension or diabetes mellitus from Hungary.患者特征对预防服务提供和全科医生预防绩效指标的影响:来自匈牙利高血压或糖尿病患者的研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):183-191. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2018.1491545.
7
Associations of Four Community Factors With Longitudinal Change in Hemoglobin A Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.四种社区因素与 2 型糖尿病患者血红蛋白 A 水平纵向变化的关联。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Mar;41(3):461-468. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1200. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Facility-level variation in diabetes and blood pressure control in patients with diabetes: Findings from the Veterans Affairs national database.糖尿病患者中糖尿病及血压控制的机构层面差异:来自退伍军人事务部国家数据库的研究结果
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1055-1060. doi: 10.1002/clc.22769. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
9
The INtegrating DEPrEssioN and Diabetes treatmENT (INDEPENDENT) study: Design and methods to address mental healthcare gaps in India.整合抑郁症与糖尿病治疗(独立)研究:解决印度精神卫生保健差距的设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Higher body mass index and lower intake of dairy products predict poor glycaemic control among Type 2 Diabetes patients in Malaysia.较高的体重指数和较低的乳制品摄入量预示着马来西亚2型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172231. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving medication adherence: challenges for physicians, payers, and policy makers.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Sep 25;166(17):1802-4. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1802.
2
Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.2型糖尿病质量改进策略对血糖控制的影响:一项Meta回归分析
JAMA. 2006 Jul 26;296(4):427-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.4.427.
3
Using clinical guidelines designed for older adults with diabetes mellitus and complex health status.使用为患有糖尿病且健康状况复杂的老年人设计的临床指南。
JAMA. 2006 Apr 26;295(16):1935-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.16.1935.
4
Therapy modifications in response to poorly controlled hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.针对血压控制不佳、血脂异常和糖尿病的治疗调整。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):475-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00006.
5
Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.制定糖尿病护理中临床惰性的质量衡量标准。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1836-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00436.x.
6
Factors driving diabetes care improvement in a large medical group: ten years of progress.大型医疗集团中推动糖尿病护理改善的因素:十年进展
Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(5 Suppl):S177-85.
7
Adding value to evidence-based clinical guidelines.为循证临床指南增添价值。
JAMA. 2005 Aug 10;294(6):741-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.6.741.
8
Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance.老年多病共患患者的临床实践指南与医疗质量:对按绩效付费的影响
JAMA. 2005 Aug 10;294(6):716-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.6.716.
9
Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions.针对患有多种疾病的患者的特定疾病指南的潜在缺陷。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2870-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb042458.
10
Population-based disease management under fee-for-service Medicare.基于人群的疾病管理在按服务收费的医疗保险制度下。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-342-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.342.