Suppr超能文献

免疫组织化学分析在评估肺癌中EML4-ALK基因重排中的作用。

The role of immunohistochemical analysis in the evaluation of EML4-ALK gene rearrangement in lung cancer.

作者信息

Sullivan Harold C, Fisher Kevin E, Hoffa Anne L, Wang Jason, Saxe Debra, Siddiqui Momin T, Cohen Cynthia

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2015 Apr;23(4):239-44. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000088.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among the mutations described in non-small cell lung carcinoma is a rearrangement resulting from an inversion within chromosome 2p leading to the formation of a fusion gene, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold standard for the detection of ALK gene rearrangements. However, molecular methods are not readily available in all pathology laboratories. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using an antibody directed against the EML4-ALK fusion protein provides a widely available alternative method of detection. We assessed whether IHC is a comparable and cost-effective alternative to FISH analysis for the detection of ALK gene rearrangements.

DESIGN

A total of 110 non-small cell lung carcinoma cases (63 surgical/biopsy and 47 cytology specimens), previously tested for ALK gene rearrangements by FISH [7 (6.4%) positive for the rearrangement], were probed for the EML4-ALK fusion protein using a monoclonal EML4-ALK antibody, clone 5A4. Cells were considered to stain positive for ALK if >5% of cells showed cytoplasmic staining of at least grade 1 intensity (scale: 0 to 3). A cost analysis was performed using ALK IHC as a screening test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the EML4-ALK IHC stain compared with ALK FISH analysis were 100% and 96%, respectively. All 7 FISH-positive cases stained positive by IHC, whereas 4 FISH-negative cases demonstrated positive staining. One of the 4 FISH-negative, IHC-positive cases harbored an EML4-ALK rearrangement by RT-PCR yielding 3 false-positive results overall. The κ agreement between IHC and FISH methods is 0.76 (substantial/excellent). The potential savings of implementing the ALK IHC as a screening method would be $10,418.21.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitivity of the EML4-ALK IHC stain is excellent (100%) but due to its suboptimal specificity, IHC cannot reliably supplant FISH analysis for the detection of ALK gene rearrangements. IHC shows promise as a screening tool to prevent unnecessary costly FISH analysis.

摘要

背景

在非小细胞肺癌中描述的突变中,有一种重排是由2号染色体短臂内的倒位导致的,从而形成了一种融合基因,即棘皮动物微管相关蛋白样4-间变性淋巴瘤激酶(EML4-ALK)。荧光原位杂交(FISH)是检测ALK基因重排的金标准。然而,并非所有病理实验室都能轻易获得分子检测方法。使用针对EML4-ALK融合蛋白的抗体进行免疫组织化学(IHC)检测提供了一种广泛可用的替代检测方法。我们评估了在检测ALK基因重排方面,IHC是否是一种与FISH分析相当且具有成本效益的替代方法。

设计

总共110例非小细胞肺癌病例(63例手术/活检和47例细胞学标本),之前已通过FISH检测ALK基因重排[7例(6.4%)重排阳性],使用单克隆EML4-ALK抗体(克隆5A4)检测EML4-ALK融合蛋白。如果>5%的细胞显示至少1级强度(范围:0至3级)的细胞质染色,则认为细胞ALK染色阳性。以ALK IHC作为筛查试验进行成本分析。

结果

与ALK FISH分析相比,EML4-ALK IHC染色的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和96%。所有7例FISH阳性病例经IHC染色均为阳性,而4例FISH阴性病例显示阳性染色。4例FISH阴性、IHC阳性病例中的1例通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测到存在EML4-ALK重排,总体产生3例假阳性结果。IHC和FISH方法之间的κ一致性为0.76(高度一致/极好)。将ALK IHC作为筛查方法实施可能节省10,418.21美元。

结论

EML4-ALK IHC染色的敏感性极佳(100%),但由于其特异性欠佳,在检测ALK基因重排方面,IHC不能可靠地替代FISH分析。IHC有望作为一种筛查工具,避免不必要的昂贵FISH分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验