Suppr超能文献

PD-L1 免疫组化在肺癌临床诊断中的应用:病理学家间的变异性高于检测方法的变异性。

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in clinical diagnostics of lung cancer: inter-pathologist variability is higher than assay variability.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Regional Laboratories Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2017 Oct;30(10):1411-1421. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.59. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

Abstract

Assessment of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical staining is used for decision on treatment with programmed cell death 1 and PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. This study aimed to compare the staining properties of tumor cells between the antibody clones 28-8, 22C3, SP142, and SP263 and investigate interrater variation between pathologists to see if these stainings can be safely evaluated in the clinical setting. Using consecutive sections from a tissue microarray with tumor tissue from 55 resected lung cancer cases, staining with five PD-L1 assays (28-8 from two different vendors, 22C3, SP142, and SP263) was performed. Seven pathologists individually evaluated the percentage of positive tumor cells, scoring each sample applying cutoff levels used in clinical studies: <1% positive tumor cells (score 0), 1-4% (score 1), 5-9% (score 2), 10-24% (score 3), 25-49% (score 4), and >50% positive tumor cells (score 5). Pairwise analysis of antibody clones showed weighted kappa values in the range of 0.45-0.91 with the highest values for comparisons with 22C3 and 28-8 and the lowest involving SP142. Excluding SP142 resulted in kappa 0.75-0.91. Weighted kappa for interobserver variation between pathologists was 0.71-0.96. Up to 20% of the cases were differently classified as positive or negative by any pathologist compared with consensus score using ≥1% positive tumor cells as cutoff. A significantly better agreement between pathologists was seen using ≥50% as cutoff (0-5% of cases). In conclusion, the concordance between the PD-L1 antibodies 22C3, 28-8 and SP263 is relatively good when evaluating lung cancers and suggests that any one of these assays may be sufficient as basis for decision on treatment with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and durvalumab. The scoring of the pathologist presents an intrinsic source of error that should be considered especially at low PD-L1 scores.

摘要

评估程序性细胞死亡配体 1(PD-L1)免疫组织化学染色用于决定是否在肺腺癌和鳞状细胞癌中使用程序性细胞死亡 1 和 PD-L1 检查点抑制剂进行治疗。本研究旨在比较肿瘤细胞在抗体克隆 28-8、22C3、SP142 和 SP263 之间的染色特性,并研究病理学家之间的组间变异性,以确定这些染色是否可以在临床环境中安全评估。使用来自 55 例肺癌切除病例的组织微阵列的连续切片,用五种 PD-L1 检测试剂盒(来自两个不同供应商的 28-8、22C3、SP142 和 SP263)进行染色。七位病理学家分别评估了阳性肿瘤细胞的百分比,对每个样本进行评分,应用临床研究中使用的截断值:<1%阳性肿瘤细胞(评分 0)、1-4%(评分 1)、5-9%(评分 2)、10-24%(评分 3)、25-49%(评分 4)和>50%阳性肿瘤细胞(评分 5)。抗体克隆的成对分析显示加权kappa 值在 0.45-0.91 之间,与 22C3 和 28-8 的比较值最高,而涉及 SP142 的值最低。排除 SP142 后,kappa 值为 0.75-0.91。病理学家之间的组间变异性的加权 kappa 值为 0.71-0.96。与使用≥1%阳性肿瘤细胞作为截断值的共识评分相比,任何一位病理学家都将高达 20%的病例分类为阳性或阴性。当使用≥50%作为截断值(0-5%的病例)时,病理学家之间的一致性明显更好。总之,在评估肺癌时,PD-L1 抗体 22C3、28-8 和 SP263 之间的一致性相对较好,这表明这些检测中的任何一种都可能足以作为决定是否使用 nivolumab、pembrolizumab 和 durvalumab 治疗的基础。病理学家的评分是一个内在的误差源,尤其是在 PD-L1 评分较低时,应予以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验