Mast Mirjam E, Vredeveld Eline J, Credoe Herman M, van Egmond Jaap, Heijenbrok Mark W, Hug Eugen B, Kalk Patrick, van Kempen-Harteveld Loes M L, Korevaar Erik W, van der Laan Hans Paul, Langendijk Johannes A, Rozema Hans J E, Petoukhova Anna L, Schippers Jacobus M, Struikmans Henk, Maduro John H
Radiotherapy Centre West, Lijnbaan 32, 2501 CK, The Hague, The Netherlands,
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Nov;148(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3149-6. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
In left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy, tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy combined with breath-hold enables a dose reduction to the heart and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Aim of this study was to investigate the added value of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with regard to decreasing the radiation dose to these structures.
In this comparative planning study, four treatment plans were generated in 20 patients: an IMPT plan and a tangential IMRT plan, both with breath-hold and free-breathing. At least 97 % of the target volume had to be covered by at least 95 % of the prescribed dose in all cases. Specifically with respect to the heart, the LAD, and the target volumes, we analyzed the maximum doses, the mean doses, and the volumes receiving 5-30 Gy.
As compared to IMRT, IMPT resulted in significant dose reductions to the heart and LAD-region even without breath-hold. In the majority of the IMPT cases, a reduction to almost zero to the heart and LAD-region was obtained. IMPT treatment plans yielded the lowest dose to the lungs.
With IMPT the dose to the heart and LAD-region could be significantly decreased compared to tangential IMRT with breath-hold. The clinical relevance should be assessed individually based on the baseline risk of cardiac complications in combination with the dose to organs at risk. However, as IMPT for breast cancer is currently not widely available, IMPT should be reserved for patients remaining at high risk for major coronary events.
在左侧乳腺癌放疗中,切线调强放疗联合屏气可降低心脏和左前降支(LAD)冠状动脉的剂量。本研究的目的是探讨调强质子治疗(IMPT)在降低这些结构辐射剂量方面的附加价值。
在这项对比计划研究中,为20例患者制定了四种治疗计划:一个IMPT计划和一个切线调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划,均采用屏气和自由呼吸方式。在所有情况下,至少97%的靶体积必须被至少95%的处方剂量覆盖。具体针对心脏、LAD和靶体积,我们分析了最大剂量、平均剂量以及接受5 - 30 Gy剂量的体积。
与IMRT相比,即使不进行屏气,IMPT也能显著降低心脏和LAD区域的剂量。在大多数IMPT病例中,心脏和LAD区域的剂量几乎降至零。IMPT治疗计划对肺部的剂量最低。
与屏气的切线IMRT相比,IMPT可显著降低心脏和LAD区域的剂量。应根据心脏并发症的基线风险以及对危及器官的剂量,单独评估其临床相关性。然而,由于目前乳腺癌的IMPT尚未广泛应用,IMPT应保留给仍处于主要冠状动脉事件高风险的患者。