Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Road, Pudong, Shanghai, 201321, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar 23;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02213-8.
This study aimed to compare the adverse reactions of conventional-dose and hypofractionated dose of proton therapy for breast cancer.
Breast cancer patients treated with proton radiotherapy in conventional-dose or hypofractionated dose were studied retrospectively.
From January 2017 to December 2019, our center treated 50 patients following lumpectomy with proton radiotherapy. According to the AJCC 8th Edition standard, there were stage I in 26 patients, stage II in 22 patients, and stage III in 2 patients. A total of 14 patients received intensity-modulated proton therapy at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, followed by a 10 Gy 4 fractionated boost to the lumpectomy cavity, while 36 received 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) 48 Gy to the lumpectomy cavity. Median follow-up time for 40.05 Gy group was 35.6 months (15-43 months). Median follow-up time for 50 Gy group was 46.8 months (36-68 months). For acute toxicity, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis in conventional-dose group were 35.7% and 57.1%, respectively. In hypofractionated dose group, the grade 1 and 2 radiodermatitis were 91.7% and 8.3%, respectively. The radiodermatitis is hypofractionneted dose better than conventional-dose significantly. Grade 1 radiation-induced esophagitis in conventional-dose group and hypofractionated dose group were 85.71% and 60%, respectively. For late toxicity, no patients developed radiation-induced pneumonitis and rib fracture in conventional-dose group. Three patients presented grade 1 pneumonitis; one patient presented graded 2 pneumonitides and two patients presented rib fracture in hypofractionated dose group. One presented hypothyroidism in hypofractionated dose group. All patients were satisfied with breast shape. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for conventional-dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 92.9%, respectively. The one- and two-year OS and DFS for hypofractionated dose group were 100 and 100; 100 and 100%, respectively.
Proton radiation therapy can significantly reduce the normal tissue dose in breast cancer patients' hearts, lungs, and other organs. Hypofractionated proton therapy shortens the treatment course with mild radiation-related adverse effects, and has a better effect on addressing the acute adverse reactions than conventional proton radiotherapy.
本研究旨在比较乳腺癌常规剂量和低分割剂量质子治疗的不良反应。
回顾性研究了在常规剂量或低分割剂量下接受质子放射治疗的乳腺癌患者。
自 2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,本中心对 50 例接受保乳手术后的患者进行了质子放射治疗。根据 AJCC 第 8 版标准,其中 I 期 26 例,II 期 22 例,III 期 2 例。共有 14 例患者接受了 50 Gy 25 次分割的调强质子治疗,随后对肿瘤切除腔进行了 10 Gy 4 次分割的推量,而 36 例患者接受了 40.05 Gy 15 次分割,肿瘤切除腔同步整合推量(SIB)48 Gy。40.05 Gy 组的中位随访时间为 35.6 个月(15-43 个月)。50 Gy 组的中位随访时间为 46.8 个月(36-68 个月)。急性毒性方面,常规剂量组 1 级和 2 级放射性皮炎分别为 35.7%和 57.1%。在低分割剂量组中,1 级和 2 级放射性皮炎分别为 91.7%和 8.3%。低分割剂量组的放射性皮炎明显好于常规剂量组。常规剂量组和低分割剂量组 1 级放射性食管炎发生率分别为 85.71%和 60%。晚期毒性方面,常规剂量组无放射性肺炎和肋骨骨折病例。3 例患者出现 1 级肺炎,1 例患者出现 2 级肺炎,2 例患者出现肋骨骨折,1 例患者出现低甲状腺功能。所有患者对乳房形状均满意。常规剂量组的 1 年和 2 年 OS 和 DFS 分别为 100%和 100%;100%和 92.9%。低分割剂量组的 1 年和 2 年 OS 和 DFS 分别为 100%和 100%;100%和 100%。
质子放疗可显著降低乳腺癌患者心脏、肺等器官的正常组织剂量。低分割质子治疗缩短了治疗时间,且放射性不良反应较轻,对急性不良反应的改善效果优于常规质子放疗。