Suppr超能文献

健康研究方法学研究报告:方法学研究报告清单(MISTIC)制定的方案。

Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC).

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):e040478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Methodological studies (ie, studies that evaluate the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of other studies in health research) address various facets of health research including, for instance, data collection techniques, differences in approaches to analyses, reporting quality, adherence to guidelines or publication bias. As a result, methodological studies can help to identify knowledge gaps in the methodology of health research and strategies for improvement in research practices. Differences in methodological study names and a lack of reporting guidance contribute to lack of comparability across studies and difficulties in identifying relevant previous methodological studies. This paper outlines the methods we will use to develop an evidence-based tool-the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist-to harmonise naming conventions and improve the reporting of methodological studies.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search for methodological studies in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, check reference lists and contact experts in the field. We will extract and summarise data on the study names, design and reporting features of the included methodological studies. Consensus on study terms and recommended reporting items will be achieved via video conference meetings with a panel of experts including researchers who have published methodological studies.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The consensus study has been exempt from ethics review by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. The results of the review and the reporting guideline will be disseminated in stakeholder meetings, conferences, peer-reviewed publications, in requests to journal editors (to endorse or make the guideline a requirement for authors), and on the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network and reporting guideline websites.

REGISTRATION

We have registered the development of the reporting guideline with the EQUATOR Network and publicly posted this project on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io/9hgbq).

摘要

简介

方法学研究(即评估健康研究中其他研究的设计、实施、分析或报告的研究)涉及健康研究的各个方面,例如数据收集技术、分析方法的差异、报告质量、对指南的遵循或发表偏倚。因此,方法学研究可以帮助确定健康研究方法学中的知识空白,并为改进研究实践提供策略。方法学研究名称的差异以及报告指南的缺乏导致了研究之间缺乏可比性,并难以确定以前相关的方法学研究。本文概述了我们将用于开发循证工具——方法学研究报告清单的方法,以协调命名约定并改进方法学研究的报告。

方法和分析

我们将在 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature、Cochrane Library、Embase、MEDLINE、Web of Science 中搜索方法学研究,并检查参考文献列表和联系该领域的专家。我们将提取并总结纳入的方法学研究的研究名称、设计和报告特征的数据。通过与包括已发表方法学研究的研究人员在内的专家小组进行视频会议,就研究术语和推荐报告项目达成共识。

伦理和传播

共识研究已获得汉密尔顿综合研究伦理委员会的伦理豁免审查。审查结果和报告指南将在利益相关者会议、会议、同行评议出版物、向期刊编辑的请求(认可或要求作者遵守指南)以及在增强健康研究质量和透明度(EQUATOR)网络和报告指南网站上传播。

注册

我们已在 EQUATOR 网络上注册了报告指南的制定,并在开放科学框架(www.osf.io/9hgbq)上公开发布了该项目。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73c9/7747548/e5cabd0db10c/bmjopen-2020-040478f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验