Martin Julie Langan, Lowrie Richard, McConnachie Alex, McLean Gary, Mair Frances, Mercer Stewart W, Smith Daniel J
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Pharmacy and Prescribing Support Unit, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde;
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Oct;64(627):e649-56. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681829.
The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) has specific targets for body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure recording in major mental illness (MMI), diabetes, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although aspects of MMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and related psychoses) are incentivised, barriers to care may occur.
To compare payment, population achievement, and exception rates for blood pressure and BMI recording in MMI relative to diabetes and CKD across the UK.
Analysis of 2012/2013 QOF data from 9731 UK general practices 2 years after the introduction of the mental health, BMI, and blood pressure QOF indicators.
Payment, exception, and population achievement rates for the MMI and CKD blood pressure indicators and the MMI and diabetes BMI indicators were calculated and compared.
UK payment and population achievement rates for BMI recording for MMI were significantly lower than for diabetes (payment: 92.7% versus 95.5% and population achievement: 84.0% versus 92.5%, P<0.001) and exception rates were higher (8.1% versus 2.0%, P<0.001). For blood pressure recording, UK payment and population achievement rates were significantly lower for MMI than for CKD (94.1% versus 97.8% and 87.0% versus 97.1%, P<0.001), while exception rate was higher (6.5% versus 0.0%, P<0.001). This was observed for all countries. Compared with England, Northern Ireland had higher population achievement rates for both mental health indicators, whereas Scotland and Wales had lower rates. There were no cross-jurisdiction differences for CKD and diabetes.
Differences in payment, exception, and population achievement rates for blood pressure and BMI recording for MMI relative to CKD and diabetes were observed across the UK. These findings suggest potential inequalities in the monitoring of physical health in MMI within the UK primary care system.
质量与结果框架(QOF)对重度精神疾病(MMI)、糖尿病和慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的体重指数(BMI)及血压记录设定了具体目标。尽管MMI(精神分裂症、双相情感障碍及相关精神病)的某些方面受到激励,但仍可能存在护理障碍。
比较英国MMI患者与糖尿病及CKD患者在血压和BMI记录方面的支付情况、人群达标率及例外率。
对引入精神健康、BMI及血压QOF指标两年后的9731家英国全科诊所的2012/2013年QOF数据进行分析。
计算并比较MMI和CKD血压指标以及MMI和糖尿病BMI指标的支付、例外及人群达标率。
英国MMI患者BMI记录的支付率和人群达标率显著低于糖尿病患者(支付率:92.7%对95.5%,人群达标率:84.0%对92.5%,P<0.001),例外率更高(8.1%对2.0%,P<0.001)。对于血压记录,英国MMI患者的支付率和人群达标率显著低于CKD患者(94.1%对97.8%,87.0%对97.1%,P<0.001),而例外率更高(6.5%对0.0%,P<0.001)。所有国家均有此现象。与英格兰相比,北爱尔兰在两项精神健康指标上的人群达标率更高,而苏格兰和威尔士则较低。CKD和糖尿病不存在跨辖区差异。
英国各地MMI患者在血压和BMI记录的支付、例外及人群达标率方面与CKD和糖尿病患者存在差异。这些发现表明英国初级医疗系统中MMI患者身体健康监测可能存在不平等现象。