• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中的预防对严重精神疾病患者初级和二级保健成本的影响。

Impact of prevention in primary care on costs in primary and secondary care for people with serious mental illness.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):343-355. doi: 10.1002/hec.4623. Epub 2022 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4623
PMID:36309945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10092448/
Abstract

A largely unexplored part of the financial incentive for physicians to participate in preventive care is the degree to which they are the residual claimant from any resulting cost savings. We examine the impact of two preventive activities for people with serious mental illness (care plans and annual reviews of physical health) by English primary care practices on costs in these practices and in secondary care. Using panel two-part models to analyze patient-level data linked across primary and secondary care, we find that these preventive activities in the previous year are associated with cost reductions in the current quarter both in primary and secondary care. We estimate that there are large beneficial externalities for which the primary care physician is not the residual claimant: the cost savings in secondary care are 4.7 times larger than the cost savings in primary care. These activities are incentivized in the English National Health Service but the total financial incentives for primary care physicians to participate were considerably smaller than the total cost savings produced. This suggests that changes to the design of incentives to increase the marginal reward for conducting these preventive activities among patients with serious mental illness could have further increased welfare.

摘要

医生参与预防保健的经济激励的一个很大程度上未被探索的部分是他们从任何由此产生的成本节约中获得剩余索取权的程度。我们通过英国初级保健实践,考察了针对严重精神疾病患者的两种预防活动(护理计划和身体健康年度审查)对这些实践和二级保健成本的影响。我们使用面板二分模型分析了初级保健和二级保健之间相互关联的患者层面数据,发现这些预防活动在前一年与当前季度的初级保健和二级保健成本降低有关。我们估计存在很大的有益外部性,而初级保健医生并不是剩余索取权人:二级保健的成本节约是初级保健的 4.7 倍。这些活动在英国国民保健制度中有激励措施,但参与的初级保健医生的总经济激励措施远远小于产生的总成本节约。这表明,为提高对严重精神疾病患者开展这些预防活动的边际奖励而改变激励措施的设计,可以进一步提高福利。

相似文献

1
Impact of prevention in primary care on costs in primary and secondary care for people with serious mental illness.初级保健中的预防对严重精神疾病患者初级和二级保健成本的影响。
Health Econ. 2023 Feb;32(2):343-355. doi: 10.1002/hec.4623. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
2
Do care plans and annual reviews of physical health influence unplanned hospital utilisation for people with serious mental illness? Analysis of linked longitudinal primary and secondary healthcare records in England.护理计划和身体健康年度评估对严重精神疾病患者的非计划住院使用情况有影响吗?对英格兰纵向关联的初级和二级医疗保健记录的分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e023135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023135.
3
4
Healthcare Costs for People with Serious Mental Illness in England: An Analysis of Costs Across Primary Care, Hospital Care, and Specialist Mental Healthcare.英国严重精神疾病患者的医疗费用:初级保健、医院护理和专科精神保健的费用分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Apr;18(2):177-188. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00530-2.
5
Report on financing the new model of family medicine.关于新型家庭医学模式融资的报告。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 Dec 2;2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-21. doi: 10.1370/afm.237.
6
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
7
Impact of secondary care financial incentives on the quality of physical healthcare for people with psychosis: a longitudinal controlled study.二级保健财务激励对精神病患者身体保健质量的影响:一项纵向对照研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;215(6):720-725. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.162.
8
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
9
Cost of treating seriously mentally ill persons with HIV following highly active retroviral therapy (HAART).高效抗逆转录病毒疗法(HAART)治疗合并严重精神疾病的HIV感染者的成本。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Dec;12(4):187-94.
10
The role of primary care in service provision for people with severe mental illness in the United Kingdom.在英国,初级保健在为严重精神疾病患者提供服务方面的作用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036468. Epub 2012 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the uptake of incentivised physical health checks for people with serious mental illness: a cohort study in primary care.评估激励性身体健康检查在严重精神疾病患者中的应用:初级保健中的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 27;74(744):e449-e455. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0532. Print 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a national primary care pay-for-performance scheme on ambulatory care sensitive hospital admissions: a small-area analysis in England.国家初级保健按绩效付费计划对门诊医疗敏感型住院治疗的影响:英格兰小范围分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e036046. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036046.
2
Disparities in cancer screening in people with mental illness across the world versus the general population: prevalence and comparative meta-analysis including 4 717 839 people.全球精神疾病患者与普通人群在癌症筛查方面的差异:纳入4717839人的患病率及比较性荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;7(1):52-63. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30414-6. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
3
Healthcare Costs for People with Serious Mental Illness in England: An Analysis of Costs Across Primary Care, Hospital Care, and Specialist Mental Healthcare.英国严重精神疾病患者的医疗费用:初级保健、医院护理和专科精神保健的费用分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Apr;18(2):177-188. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00530-2.
4
Impact of family practice continuity of care on unplanned hospital use for people with serious mental illness.家庭医疗连续性照护对严重精神疾病患者非计划性住院使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54(6):1316-1325. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13211. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Workload impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for patients with diabetes: an interrupted time series in general practice.工作量对糖尿病患者质量和结果框架的影响:一般实践中的中断时间序列。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):e570-e577. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704645. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
6
QOF now accounts for less than 10% of GP practice income.目前,质量与 outcomes 框架(QOF)在全科医生诊疗收入中所占比例不到10%。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 2;365:l1489. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1489.
7
Effects of Pay-for-Performance for Primary Care Physicians on Preventable Diabetes-Related Hospitalization Costs Among Adults in New Brunswick, Canada: A Quasiexperimental Evaluation.加拿大新不伦瑞克省初级保健医生按绩效付费对成年人可预防糖尿病相关住院费用的影响:准实验评估。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Jul;43(5):354-360.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
8
Do care plans and annual reviews of physical health influence unplanned hospital utilisation for people with serious mental illness? Analysis of linked longitudinal primary and secondary healthcare records in England.护理计划和身体健康年度评估对严重精神疾病患者的非计划住院使用情况有影响吗?对英格兰纵向关联的初级和二级医疗保健记录的分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e023135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023135.
9
Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study.财务和声誉激励对初级保健绩效的影响:一项纵向研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;68(677):e811-e818. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699797. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
10
The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review.质量和结果框架在长期疾病护理中的作用:系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e775-e784. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693077. Epub 2017 Sep 25.