• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国重度精神疾病成年患者的医疗服务可及性、不平等状况与年度健康检查:一项混合方法的系统评价

Access, inequalities and annual health checks (AHCs) for adults living with severe mental illness in the UK: a mixed-methods systematic review.

作者信息

Owens Janine, Ravindrarajah Rathi, Norman Gill, Hopkin Elinor, Shi Chunhu, Lovell Karina, Bee Penny E

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 4;15(8):e093426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093426.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093426
PMID:40759520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12323543/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Individuals living with severe mental illness (SMI) are at a significantly higher risk of mortality. This mixed-methods systematic review identifies and explores factors, including access inequalities to annual health checks (AHCs), for people living with SMI sharing protected characteristics in the UK, as identified in Core20PLUS5.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ASSIA, Google Scholar and the grey literature were searched from 1 January 2004 to 30 January 2025.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were adults >18 years of age living with SMI. We included studies of AHCs, short health screening interventions, health promotion interventions, considering or aiming to improve uptake and/or access to screening for people living with SMI. We included mixed-methods and quantitative studies: randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies and process evaluations. We also included qualitative studies.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the evidence for inclusion using the eligibility criteria at title, abstract and at full-text screening. Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies was used for methodological quality. Analysis used Levesque's Conceptual Framework of Access as an a priori framework and dimensions of equality from Core20PLUS5 and PROGRESS PLUS. Separate and independent quantitative and qualitative narrative syntheses and integration of the evidence from both occurred.

RESULTS

36 studies were included. Five studies applied reasonable adjustments to increase access to AHCs but lacked evaluation, controls and comparisons. 26 studies failed to discuss deprivation or ethnicity and only 6 studies discussed barriers and facilitators of access to AHCs for people of different ethnic, linguistic or cultural backgrounds. There was no evidence for interventions improving access to AHCs. Access focused primarily on dimensions of services, over abilities to access AHCs for people living with SMI.

CONCLUSIONS

There are access inequalities to AHCs for people living with SMI sharing protected characteristics. Robust research is urgently needed to identify, modify and ameliorate barriers to the policy recommended AHCs.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023437905.

摘要

目标

患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体死亡风险显著更高。这项混合方法的系统评价识别并探讨了影响因素,包括年度健康检查(AHCs)的获取不平等情况,针对的是英国具有《核心20加5》中所确定的受保护特征的SMI患者。

设计

混合方法的系统评价。

数据来源

检索了2004年1月1日至2025年1月30日期间的MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ASSIA、谷歌学术以及灰色文献。

纳入标准

纳入标准为年龄大于18岁的患有SMI的成年人。我们纳入了关于AHCs、简短健康筛查干预、健康促进干预的研究,这些研究考虑或旨在提高SMI患者接受筛查的比例和/或机会。我们纳入了混合方法和定量研究:随机对照试验、非随机对照研究、队列研究、横断面研究和过程评估。我们还纳入了定性研究。

数据提取与综合

两名评审员独立使用纳入标准在标题、摘要和全文筛选阶段评估纳入证据。使用不同研究的质量评估来评估方法学质量。分析使用Levesque的获取概念框架作为先验框架,并结合《核心20加5》和“PROGRESS PLUS”中的平等维度。分别独立进行定量和定性的叙述性综合,并整合来自两者的证据。

结果

纳入了36项研究。5项研究进行了合理调整以增加获得AHCs的机会,但缺乏评估、对照和比较。26项研究未讨论贫困或种族问题,只有6项研究讨论了不同种族、语言或文化背景的人获得AHCs的障碍和促进因素。没有证据表明干预措施能改善获得AHCs的机会。获取主要关注服务维度,而非SMI患者获得AHCs的能力。

结论

具有受保护特征的SMI患者在获得AHCs方面存在获取不平等。迫切需要进行有力的研究,以识别、修改和改善政策推荐的AHCs的障碍。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023437905。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e4b/12323543/fd40261b73b6/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e4b/12323543/fd40261b73b6/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e4b/12323543/fd40261b73b6/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Access, inequalities and annual health checks (AHCs) for adults living with severe mental illness in the UK: a mixed-methods systematic review.英国重度精神疾病成年患者的医疗服务可及性、不平等状况与年度健康检查:一项混合方法的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 4;15(8):e093426. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093426.
2
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.
3
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
4
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
The clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of community-based interventions aimed at improving or maintaining quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: a systematic review.旨在改善或维持患有严重精神疾病父母的子女生活质量的社区干预措施的临床效果、成本效益和可接受性:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(8):1-250. doi: 10.3310/hta18080.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and patient characteristics associated with cardiovascular disease risk factor screening in UK primary care for people with severe mental illness: an electronic healthcare record study.英国初级医疗中针对重症精神疾病患者进行心血管疾病风险因素筛查的患病率及患者特征:一项电子健康记录研究
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jan 15;28(1):e301409. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301409.
2
Providing Physical Health Checks for People with Severe Mental Illness in Primary Care in England: An Evaluation of a Locally Enhanced Service.在英格兰初级医疗保健中为严重精神疾病患者提供身体健康检查:一项地方强化服务评估
Nurs Rep. 2024 Dec 6;14(4):3864-3877. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040282.
3
Physical Health Checks and Follow-Up Care in Deprived and Ethnically Diverse People With Severe Mental Illness: Co-Designed Recommendations for Better Care.
贫困和种族多样化的严重精神疾病患者的身体健康检查和后续护理:更好护理的共同设计建议。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70005. doi: 10.1111/hex.70005.
4
Assessing the uptake of incentivised physical health checks for people with serious mental illness: a cohort study in primary care.评估激励性身体健康检查在严重精神疾病患者中的应用:初级保健中的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jun 27;74(744):e449-e455. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0532. Print 2024 Jul.
5
Collaborative care approaches for people with severe mental illness.严重精神疾病患者的协作式护理方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 7;5(5):CD009531. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009531.pub3.
6
An integrated primary care service to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in people with severe mental illness: Primrose-A - thematic analysis of its acceptability, feasibility, and implementation.综合初级保健服务以降低严重精神疾病患者的心血管疾病风险:Primrose-A-对其可接受性、可行性和实施情况的专题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10628-6.
7
Understanding inequalities in access to adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic mapping review.了解英国成人心理健康服务获取方面的不平等现象:系统映射综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10030-8.
8
Inequalities in cancer screening participation between adults with and without severe mental illness: results from a cross-sectional analysis of primary care data on English Screening Programmes.癌症筛查参与度在有严重精神疾病和无严重精神疾病的成年人之间的不平等:基于英国筛查项目初级保健数据的横断面分析结果。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Jul;129(1):81-93. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02249-3. Epub 2023 May 4.
9
Estimated impact from the withdrawal of primary care financial incentives on selected indicators of quality of care in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis.苏格兰初级保健财政激励措施退出对选定护理质量指标的影响估计:对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 22;380:e072098. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072098.
10
Interventions to Promote the Utilization of Physical Health Care for People with Severe Mental Illness: A Scoping Review.促进严重精神疾病患者利用身体健康护理的干预措施:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010126.