心理动力疗法与抑郁症常规治疗的对比
Psychodynamic therapies versus treatment as usual for depression.
作者信息
Moore Theresa Hm, Hunot Vivien, Davies Philippa, Caldwell Deborah, Jones Hannah, Lewis Glyn, Churchill Rachel
机构信息
Academic Unit of Psychiatry, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(9). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008707.
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all psychodynamic therapies compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression.To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of different psychodynamic therapy models (drive/structural, relational and integrative analytic models) compared with treatment as usual/waiting list/attention placebo control conditions for acute depression.To examine the effectiveness and acceptability of all psychodynamic therapies compared with different types of comparator (standard care, no treatment, waiting list, attention placebo) for acute depression.
这是一项综述的方案，没有摘要。目标如下：考察与常规治疗/等待名单/注意力安慰剂对照条件相比，所有心理动力疗法对急性抑郁症的有效性和可接受性。考察与常规治疗/等待名单/注意力安慰剂对照条件相比，不同心理动力疗法模型（驱力/结构模型、关系模型和综合分析模型）对急性抑郁症的有效性和可接受性。考察与不同类型的对照（标准护理、无治疗、等待名单、注意力安慰剂）相比，所有心理动力疗法对急性抑郁症的有效性和可接受性。
Zotero 插件