Severijns Deborah, Lamers Ilse, Kerkhofs Lore, Feys Peter
REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University , Diepenbeek, Belgium.
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):154-60. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1897.
Hand grip strength in both the dominant and non-dominant hands is often used to assess upper limb impairment. Excessive hand grip fatigability is another important measure, as fatigability may also influence activities of daily living.
To investigate to what extent hand grip fatigability in multiple sclerosis is dependent on hand dominance, muscle strength and disease progression.
Thirty persons with multiple sclerosis and 16 healthy controls performed 15 repeated maximal hand grip contractions and a 30 s sustained contraction in order to determine dynamic and static fatigue indices. Fatigability was compared between the dominant and non-dominant hands and between the more and less affected hands in a subgroup of persons with multiple sclerosis with asymmetrical hand grip strength impairment. Furthermore, fatigability was compared between controls and subgroups of persons with multiple sclerosis with different disease progression.
There was no difference in fatigability between dominant and non-dominant hands in healthy controls or in persons with multiple sclerosis. Similarly, there was no difference between the more and less affected hands in the subgroup of persons with multiple sclerosis with asymmetrical hand grip impairment. The dynamic fatigue index did not discriminate persons with multiple sclerosis from controls. While the static fatigue index was not different between healthy controls and persons with multiple sclerosis with low to moderate (< 6) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), it was significantly higher in persons with multiple sclerosis with high (≥ 6) EDSS scores. The static fatigue index was related to the EDSS score, but not to maximal grip strength.
Fatigability of hand grip strength in persons with multiple sclerosis is not influenced by hand dominance or muscle strength, but there is a correlation with disease progression. Differences in fatigability between healthy controls and, in particular, persons with multiple sclerosis with high EDSS, were found during sustained, but not during dynamic, contractions.
优势手和非优势手的握力常被用于评估上肢损伤。过度的握力易疲劳性是另一项重要指标,因为易疲劳性也可能影响日常生活活动。
探讨多发性硬化症患者的握力易疲劳性在多大程度上取决于手的优势、肌肉力量和疾病进展。
30例多发性硬化症患者和16名健康对照者进行15次重复的最大握力收缩和30秒持续收缩,以确定动态和静态疲劳指数。在握力不对称受损的多发性硬化症患者亚组中,比较优势手和非优势手之间以及受累程度较重和较轻的手之间的易疲劳性。此外,还比较了健康对照者与不同疾病进展的多发性硬化症患者亚组之间的易疲劳性。
健康对照者或多发性硬化症患者的优势手和非优势手在易疲劳性方面没有差异。同样,在握力不对称受损的多发性硬化症患者亚组中,受累程度较重和较轻的手之间也没有差异。动态疲劳指数无法区分多发性硬化症患者和对照者。虽然健康对照者与扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分为低至中度(<6)的多发性硬化症患者之间的静态疲劳指数没有差异,但EDSS评分高(≥6)的多发性硬化症患者的静态疲劳指数显著更高。静态疲劳指数与EDSS评分相关,但与最大握力无关。
多发性硬化症患者的握力易疲劳性不受手的优势或肌肉力量影响,但与疾病进展相关。在持续收缩期间发现了健康对照者与尤其是EDSS评分高的多发性硬化症患者之间在易疲劳性方面的差异,但在动态收缩期间未发现。