Maita María Del Rosario, Mareovich Florencia, Peralta Olga
a Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina.
J Genet Psychol. 2014 Sep-Dec;175(5-6):401-15. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2014.941320.
Children are exposed to symbolic objects that they have to learn to use very early in life. The authors' aim was to examine whether it is possible to intentionally teach young children the symbolic function of an object. They employed a search task in which children had to use a map to find a toy. Experiment 1 revealed that with no instruction 3-year-, 10-month-old children were quite successful; 3-year-, 6-month-olds showed a divided performance; and 3-year-, 0-month-olds failed. With this baseline, Experiment 2 compared the performance of 3-year-, 0-month-olds in three different conditions: no-instruction, complete instruction (before the task begins), and teaching (complete instruction plus corrective feedback); only children in the teaching condition succeeded. However, children 6 months younger, 2-year-, 6-month-olds, failed despite teaching that was provided (Study 3). This research shows that at some points in development instruction is not enough; intentional teaching in communicative contexts is the mechanism that boosts symbolic understanding in early childhood.
儿童在生命早期就接触到他们必须学会使用的符号化物品。作者的目的是研究是否有可能有意地向幼儿教授物品的符号功能。他们采用了一项搜索任务,让儿童使用地图寻找玩具。实验1表明,在没有指导的情况下,3岁10个月大的儿童表现相当成功;3岁6个月大的儿童表现参差不齐;3岁0个月大的儿童则失败了。以此为基线,实验2比较了3岁0个月大的儿童在三种不同条件下的表现:无指导、完整指导(在任务开始前)和教学(完整指导加上纠正反馈);只有处于教学条件下的儿童成功了。然而,小6个月的2岁6个月大的儿童,尽管接受了教学(研究3),但仍然失败了。这项研究表明,在发展的某些阶段,指导是不够的;在交流情境中的有意教学是促进幼儿符号理解的机制。