• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对词汇和句法知识之间说话人可靠性的理解。

Children's understanding of speaker reliability between lexical and syntactic knowledge.

机构信息

CLPS Department, Box 1821, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):523-32. doi: 10.1037/a0029658. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1037/a0029658
PMID:22889393
Abstract

Many studies suggest that preschoolers rely on individuals' histories of generating accurate lexical information when learning novel lexical information from them. The present study examined whether children used a speaker's accuracy about one kind of linguistic knowledge to make inferences about another kind of linguistic knowledge, focusing specifically on syntax and the lexicon. In Experiment 1, we presented children with 2 live speakers who were lexically accurate, but differed in their appropriate use of subject-verb agreement. Older 4-year-olds, but not younger 4-year-olds, relied on the accurate speaker to learn new labels for novel objects. We suggest only the older 4-year-olds might have registered that the inaccurate speaker was an unreliable source of novel linguistic information. In Experiment 2, 4-year-olds observed 2 speakers whose utterances were syntactically accurate, but differed in lexical accuracy. All 4-year-olds used the speakers' accuracy to guide how they learned novel lexical information and novel irregular plurals, but not how they learned novel irregular past tense forms that children often regularize. These results suggest that when learning novel syntactic information, reliability information might interact with underlying linguistic regularity.

摘要

许多研究表明,幼儿在从他人那里学习新的词汇信息时,会依赖于这些人过去生成准确词汇信息的历史记录。本研究考察了儿童是否会利用说话者在某一类语言知识上的准确性来推断另一类语言知识,特别是在语法和词汇方面。在实验 1 中,我们向儿童呈现了 2 位说话者,他们在词汇方面非常准确,但在主谓一致的正确使用上有所不同。年长的 4 岁儿童,而不是年幼的 4 岁儿童,依赖准确的说话者来学习新的对象标签。我们认为,只有年长的 4 岁儿童可能已经注意到不准确的说话者是不可靠的新语言信息来源。在实验 2 中,4 岁儿童观察了 2 位说话者,他们的话语在语法上是准确的,但在词汇上有所不同。所有 4 岁儿童都利用说话者的准确性来指导他们学习新的词汇信息和新的不规则复数形式,但不能指导他们学习儿童经常规则化的新的不规则过去式形式。这些结果表明,在学习新的语法信息时,可靠性信息可能与潜在的语言规则相互作用。

相似文献

1
Children's understanding of speaker reliability between lexical and syntactic knowledge.儿童对词汇和句法知识之间说话人可靠性的理解。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):523-32. doi: 10.1037/a0029658. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
2
Accuracy trumps accent in children's endorsement of object labels.在儿童对物体标签的认可中,准确性胜过口音。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):470-9. doi: 10.1037/a0030604. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
3
Identifying unreliable informants: do children excuse past inaccuracy?识别不可靠的信息提供者:儿童会原谅过去的不准确信息吗?
Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):41-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00750.x.
4
The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.说话者的交际风格会影响语言理解吗?来自反语理解的 ERP 证据。
Brain Res. 2010 Jan 22;1311:121-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.077. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
5
When being right is not enough: four-year-olds distinguish knowledgeable informants from merely accurate informants.当正确还不够:四岁儿童能够区分有知识的信息提供者和仅仅准确的信息提供者。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1250-3. doi: 10.1177/0956797611416998. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
6
Children's use of information quality to establish speaker preferences.儿童使用信息质量来建立说话者偏好。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):480-90. doi: 10.1037/a0029479. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
7
I don't believe what you said before: Preschoolers retrospectively discount information from inaccurate speakers.我不相信你之前说的话:学龄前儿童会对不准确的说话者提供的信息进行回溯折扣。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;189:104701. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104701. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
8
Development in children's comprehension of linguistic register.儿童对语言语域理解的发展。
Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01502.x.
9
Developmental differences in the relative weighing of informants' social attributes.发展过程中,信息提供者社会属性的相对权重存在差异。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):602-13. doi: 10.1037/a0031674. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Preschoolers trust novel members of accurate speakers' groups and judge them favourably.学龄前儿童信任准确表达者群体中的新成员,并对他们做出积极评价。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 May;67(5):872-83. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.836234.

引用本文的文献

1
Epistemic trust: a comprehensive review of empirical insights and implications for developmental psychopathology.认知信任:对实证见解及对发展性精神病理学影响的全面综述
Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):704. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.704.
2
Children Treat Grammatical Errors Differently for Native and Non-Native Speakers.儿童对母语和非母语使用者的语法错误处理方式不同。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 22;13:855130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855130. eCollection 2022.
3
Epistemic Vigilance in Early Ontogeny: Children's Use of Nonverbal Behavior to Detect Deception.
早期发生认识论警觉:儿童使用非言语行为来察觉欺骗。
Evol Psychol. 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):1474704920986860. doi: 10.1177/1474704920986860.
4
Do Children Copy an Expert or a Majority? Examining Selective Learning in Instrumental and Normative Contexts.儿童会模仿专家还是多数人?探究工具性和规范性情境中的选择性学习。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 21;11(10):e0164698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164698. eCollection 2016.
5
Preschoolers' Preference for Syntactic Complexity Varies by Socioeconomic Status.学龄前儿童对句法复杂性的偏好因社会经济地位而异。
Child Dev. 2016 Sep;87(5):1529-37. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12553. Epub 2016 May 25.