Reimert Inonge, Rodenburg T Bas, Ursinus Winanda W, Kemp Bas, Bolhuis J Elizabeth
Wageningen University, Department of Animal Sciences, Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University, Department of Animal Sciences, Behavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 2;9(9):e108700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108700. eCollection 2014.
Pigs living in intensive husbandry systems may experience both acute and chronic stress through standard management procedures and limitations in their physical and social environment, which may have implications for their immune status. Here, the effect of a new breeding method where pigs were selected on their heritable influence on their pen mates' growth, and environmental enrichment on the immune status of pigs was investigated. Hereto, 240 pigs with a relatively positive genetic effect on the growth of their pen mates (+SBV) and 240 pigs with a relatively negative genetic effect on the growth of their pen mates (-SBV) were housed in barren or straw-enriched pens from 4 to 23 weeks of age (n = 80 pens in total). A blood sample was taken from the pigs before, three days after a 24 h regrouping test, and at week 22. In addition, effects of coping style, as assessed in a backtest, and gender were also investigated. Mainly, +SBV were found to have lower leukocyte, lymphocyte and haptoglobin concentrations than -SBV pigs. Enriched housed pigs had a lower neutrophil to lymphocyte (N:L) ratio and lower haptoglobin concentrations, but had higher antibody titers specific for Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) than barren housed pigs. No interactions were found between SBV class and housing. Furthermore, pigs with a proactive coping style had higher alternative complement activity and, in the enriched pens, higher antibody titers specific for KLH than pigs with a reactive coping style. Lastly, females tended to have lower leukocyte, but higher haptoglobin concentrations than castrated males. Overall, these results suggest that +SBV pigs and enriched housed pigs were less affected by stress than -SBV and barren housed pigs, respectively. Moreover, immune activation might be differently organized in individuals with different coping styles and to a lesser extent in individuals of opposite genders.
生活在集约化养殖系统中的猪,可能会因标准管理程序以及其物理和社会环境的限制而经历急性和慢性应激,这可能会对它们的免疫状态产生影响。在此,研究了一种新的育种方法(根据猪对其同栏伙伴生长的遗传影响进行选择)以及环境富集对猪免疫状态的影响。为此,将240头对其同栏伙伴生长具有相对积极遗传效应的猪(+SBV)和240头对其同栏伙伴生长具有相对消极遗传效应的猪(-SBV),从4周龄饲养至23周龄,分别饲养在贫瘠或有稻草富集的猪栏中(总共80个猪栏)。在24小时重新分组试验前、试验后三天以及第22周时,采集猪的血样。此外,还研究了在背部测试中评估的应对方式以及性别的影响。主要发现,+SBV猪的白细胞、淋巴细胞和触珠蛋白浓度低于-SBV猪。生活在富集环境中的猪中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞(N:L)比值较低,触珠蛋白浓度较低,但对钥孔戚血蓝蛋白(KLH)的特异性抗体滴度高于生活在贫瘠环境中的猪。未发现SBV类别与饲养环境之间存在相互作用。此外,具有主动应对方式的猪比具有被动应对方式的猪具有更高替代补体活性,并且在富集猪栏中,对KLH的特异性抗体滴度更高。最后,雌性猪的白细胞数量往往低于去势雄性猪,但触珠蛋白浓度更高。总体而言,这些结果表明,+SBV猪和生活在富集环境中的猪分别比-SBV猪和生活在贫瘠环境中的猪受应激的影响更小。此外,具有不同应对方式的个体免疫激活的组织方式可能不同,在性别相反的个体中程度较小。