• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Coincidence in fragile site expression with fluorodeoxyuridine and bromodeoxyuridine.

作者信息

Fundia A F, Larripa I B

机构信息

Department of Cytogenetics, Instituto de Investigaciones Hematológicas Mariano R. Castex, Academía Nacional de Medicina de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1989 Aug;41(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(89)90106-4.

DOI:10.1016/0165-4608(89)90106-4
PMID:2527595
Abstract

Fragile site expression induced by 10 micrograms/ml or 20 micrograms/ml fluorodeoxyuridine (FudR) and 25 micrograms/ml or 50 micrograms/ml bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) was studied in lymphocyte cultures of six healthy individuals. A significant decrease in mitotic indexes in respect to control cultures was observed with both FudR concentrations used. The cells showing chromosome aberrations and the total number of cytogenetic alterations were significantly increased both in FudR (p less than 0.001) and BrdU (25 micrograms/ml) (p less than 0.05) treated cultures with respect to the control culture. A site showing a gap or a break was defined as fragile if it appeared in 1% of the cells analyzed and in at least three of the six individuals studied with the same culture treatment. Using these criteria, fragile sites 4q31, 5q15, 6p22, 7p13, 7q32, 13q21, and 14q24 were induced in different proportions by both chemical agents. Although these drugs act via different mechanisms, they both substitute for thymidine in DNA. Our findings suggest that FudR is a more potent common fragile site inducer than BrdU.

摘要

相似文献

1
Coincidence in fragile site expression with fluorodeoxyuridine and bromodeoxyuridine.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1989 Aug;41(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(89)90106-4.
2
[Expression of new fragile sites detected in lymphoproliferative processes].[在淋巴增殖性病变中检测到的新脆性位点的表达]
Sangre (Barc). 1990 Feb;35(1):4-9.
3
New common fragile sites.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988 Jul 1;33(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90042-8.
4
An in vitro and in vivo study of a BrdU-sensitive fragile site in the Chinese hamster.中国仓鼠中一个对5-溴脱氧尿苷敏感的脆性位点的体外和体内研究。
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1984;38(3):211-5. doi: 10.1159/000132062.
5
Expression of aphidicolin, FUdR and caffeine-induced fragile sites in lymphocytes of healthy Turkish individuals.健康土耳其个体淋巴细胞中阿非科林、氟尿苷和咖啡因诱导的脆性位点的表达
Genetica. 1999;105(1):109-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1003799927024.
6
Fragile sites and genitourinary tumors.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1988 Mar;31(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(88)90012-x.
7
Folate sensitive common fragile sites in chromosomes of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa).家猪(野猪)染色体中的叶酸敏感常见脆性位点。
Res Vet Sci. 1993 Sep;55(2):231-5. doi: 10.1016/0034-5288(93)90086-u.
8
Fragile sites induced by FUdR, caffeine, and aphidicolin. Their frequency, distribution, and analysis.由氟尿嘧啶核苷、咖啡因和阿非迪霉素诱导的脆性位点。它们的频率、分布及分析。
Hum Genet. 1988 Jan;78(1):21-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00291228.
9
The effect of caffeine on fragile X expression.咖啡因对脆性X表达的影响。
Hum Genet. 1986 May;73(1):20-2. doi: 10.1007/BF00292657.
10
Fragile site expression in families with von Hippel-Lindau disease.冯·希佩尔-林道病家族中的脆性位点表达
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1989 Jun;39(2):157-66. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(89)90181-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic alterations of chromosomes, p53 and p16 genes in low- and high-grade bladder cancer.低级别和高级别膀胱癌中染色体、p53和p16基因的遗传改变
Oncol Lett. 2014 Jul;8(1):25-32. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2108. Epub 2014 May 2.
2
Reduced levels of DNA polymerase delta induce chromosome fragile site instability in yeast.DNA聚合酶δ水平降低会导致酵母染色体脆弱位点不稳定。
Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Sep;28(17):5359-68. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02084-07. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
3
Increased expression of 5q31 fragile site in a Bloom syndrome family.
Hum Genet. 1992 Jul;89(5):569-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00219187.