Suppr超能文献

共同关注的分化社群:绘制社会科学期刊中电子健康研究的知识结构

The divided communities of shared concerns: mapping the intellectual structure of e-Health research in social science journals.

作者信息

Jiang L Crystal, Wang Zhen-Zhen, Peng Tai-Quan, Zhu Jonathan J H

机构信息

Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

Web Mining Lab, Department of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jan;84(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Social scientific approach has become an important approach in e-Health studies over the past decade. However, there has been little systematical examination of what aspects of e-Health social scientists have studied and how relevant and informative knowledge has been produced and diffused by this line of inquiry. This study performed a systematic review of the body of e-Health literature in mainstream social science journals over the past decade by testing the applicability of a 5A categorization (i.e., access, availability, appropriateness, acceptability, and applicability), proposed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as a framework for understanding social scientific research in e-Health.

METHODS

This study used a quantitative, bottom-up approach to review the e-Health literature in social sciences published from 2000 to 2009. A total of 3005 e-Health studies identified from two social sciences databases (i.e., Social Sciences Citation Index and Arts & Humanities Citation Index) were analyzed with text topic modeling and structural analysis of co-word network, co-citation network, and scientific food web.

RESULTS

There have been dramatic increases in the scale of e-Health studies in social sciences over the past decade in terms of the numbers of publications, journal outlets and participating disciplines. The results empirically confirm the presence of the 5A clusters in e-Health research, with the cluster of applicability as the dominant research area and the cluster of availability as the major knowledge producer for other clusters. The network analysis also reveals that the five distinctive clusters share much more in common in research concerns than what e-Health scholars appear to recognize.

CONCLUSIONS

It is time to explicate and, more importantly, tap into the shared concerns cutting across the seemingly divided scholarly communities. In particular, more synergy exercises are needed to promote adherence of the field.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,社会科学方法已成为电子健康研究中的一种重要方法。然而,对于电子健康社会科学家所研究的方面,以及通过这一研究方向产生和传播的相关信息性知识,几乎没有进行系统的审视。本研究通过测试美国卫生与公众服务部提出的5A分类法(即可及性、可用性、适宜性、可接受性和适用性)作为理解电子健康领域社会科学研究的框架的适用性,对过去十年主流社会科学期刊中的电子健康文献进行了系统综述。

方法

本研究采用定量的、自下而上的方法来综述2000年至2009年发表的社会科学领域的电子健康文献。从两个社会科学数据库(即社会科学引文索引和艺术与人文引文索引)中识别出的总共3005项电子健康研究,通过文本主题建模以及共词网络、共被引网络和科学知识图谱的结构分析进行了分析。

结果

在过去十年中,社会科学领域电子健康研究的规模在出版物数量、期刊渠道和参与学科方面都有显著增长。结果实证证实了电子健康研究中5A集群的存在,其中适用性集群是主导研究领域,可用性集群是其他集群的主要知识生产者。网络分析还表明,这五个不同的集群在研究关注点上的共同之处比电子健康学者似乎认识到的要多得多。

结论

现在是时候阐明,更重要的是,挖掘跨越看似分裂的学术群体的共同关注点了。特别是,需要更多的协同合作来促进该领域的坚持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验