• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医生和用户对初级保健中电子健康进展的看法]

[Opinion of doctors and users on e-health advances in primary care].

作者信息

Cernadas Ramos Andrés, Bouzas-Lorenzo Ramón, Mesa Del Olmo Adela, Barral Buceta Bran

机构信息

Departamento de Ciencia Política y Sociología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España.

Departamento de Ciencia Política y Sociología, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2020 Jun-Jul;52(6):389-399. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2019.05.008
PMID:31266646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7256801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To find out the opinions of users and primary care doctors on the progress of e-health in primary care.

DESIGN

Focus groups set up between 1st May and 25th September 2018.

LOCATION

Primary care level in regional online health services.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 29 users and 33 primary care doctors linked to primary care that were contacted, through user associations and regional public health services, respectively.

METHOD

Inductive analysis of transcripts from focus groups about the following issues: accessibility and security; efficiency; information and technical problems; potentialities.

RESULTS

Online health services are positively valued in terms of cost savings both by users and doctors of primary care. Nevertheless, face-to-face interaction is still considered a key factor in the quality of service. When it comes to the access and provision of e-health services, there is shared concern for the security of the data and for the training deficiencies of users and doctors. An adequate design of the applications becomes a condition for the acceptance and diffusion of technologies that support online health.

CONCLUSIONS

Health authorities should intensify the use of new technologies oriented towards easing the work of doctors, simplifying bureaucratic tasks, providing diagnostic and prescription security, and protecting data. As long as systems generate failures and mistrust, new technologies will remain to be perceived as a complement, but not as an alternative to the traditional care model.

摘要

目的

了解用户和基层医疗医生对基层医疗中电子健康进展的看法。

设计

于2018年5月1日至9月25日期间设立焦点小组。

地点

区域在线健康服务中的基层医疗层面。

参与者

通过用户协会和区域公共卫生服务机构分别联系到的29名用户和33名与基层医疗相关的基层医疗医生。

方法

对焦点小组关于以下问题的记录进行归纳分析:可及性与安全性;效率;信息与技术问题;潜力。

结果

基层医疗的用户和医生都对在线健康服务在节省成本方面给予了积极评价。然而,面对面互动仍被视为服务质量的关键因素。在电子健康服务的获取和提供方面,人们对数据安全以及用户和医生的培训不足存在共同担忧。应用程序的合理设计成为支持在线健康的技术被接受和推广的一个条件。

结论

卫生当局应加强使用旨在减轻医生工作负担、简化官僚任务、提供诊断和处方安全性以及保护数据的新技术。只要系统产生故障和不信任,新技术将仍被视为传统护理模式的补充,而非替代。

相似文献

1
[Opinion of doctors and users on e-health advances in primary care].[医生和用户对初级保健中电子健康进展的看法]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Jun-Jul;52(6):389-399. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
2
Integrated services for neglected tropical diseases and mental health: pilot study assessing acceptability, feasibility and attitudes in Benue State, Nigeria.被忽视热带病与精神卫生综合服务:在尼日利亚贝努埃州评估可接受性、可行性和态度的试点研究
Int Health. 2023 Dec 20;15(Supplement_3):iii37-iii46. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad073.
3
4
Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.卫生工作者对使用移动健康技术提供初级卫生保健服务的看法和体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 26;3(3):CD011942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011942.pub2.
5
A profile of patients' and doctors' perceptions, acceptance, and utilization of e-health in a deprived region in southwestern China.中国西南部贫困地区患者与医生对电子健康的认知、接受度及使用情况概述
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Apr 25;2(4):e0000238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000238. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Evaluation of e-health (Seha) application: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.电子健康(Seha)应用评估:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01437-6.
7
Telemedicine consultations with physicians in Swedish primary care: a mixed methods study of users' experiences and care patterns.远程医疗咨询与瑞典初级保健医生:用户体验和护理模式的混合方法研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Jun;39(2):204-213. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1913904. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
A multimethod study of NHS 111 online.NHS111 在线的多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(5):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTRR9821.
9
Strengths of primary healthcare regarding care provided for chronic kidney disease.初级医疗保健在慢性肾脏病护理方面的优势。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Sep 9;24(0):e2801. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1234.2801.
10
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Offerings and User Demands of eHealth Services in Spain: National Survey.西班牙电子健康服务的提供与用户需求:全国性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 18;25:e42304. doi: 10.2196/42304.
2
eHealth and mHealth Development in Spain: Promise or Reality?西班牙的电子健康和移动医疗发展:是承诺还是现实?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13055. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413055.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
2
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.屏幕对屏幕咨询与面对面咨询对医患沟通的影响:一项针对模拟患者的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033.
3
[Web accessibility of Internet appointment scheduling in primary care].[基层医疗中互联网预约挂号的网络可及性]
Gac Sanit. 2019 Jan-Feb;33(1):85-88. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
4
Evaluating Patient Empowerment in Association With eHealth Technology: Scoping Review.评估与电子健康技术相关的患者赋权:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 29;19(9):e329. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7809.
5
Health information systems evaluation frameworks: A systematic review.健康信息系统评估框架:一项系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update).影响电子健康实施的因素:系统评价的系统综述(更新版)
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7.
7
The divided communities of shared concerns: mapping the intellectual structure of e-Health research in social science journals.共同关注的分化社群:绘制社会科学期刊中电子健康研究的知识结构
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jan;84(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
[A guide to good practice for information security in the handling of personal health data by health personnel in ambulatory care facilities].[流动护理设施中卫生人员处理个人健康数据时信息安全的良好实践指南]
Aten Primaria. 2014 Apr;46(4):214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2013.10.008. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
9
[Measurement of the importance of user satisfaction dimensions in healthcare provision].
Gac Sanit. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):304-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
10
[FAQs on the effects of e-health on the doctor-patient relationship].[关于电子健康对医患关系影响的常见问题解答]
Aten Primaria. 2010 Feb;42(2):112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2008.12.013. Epub 2009 May 20.