• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性妇科疾病后的生活质量比较。

Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease.

作者信息

Eom Jeong Min, Kim Kye Hyun, Yuk Jin-Sung, Roh Sung Il, Lee Jung Hun

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1850-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3875-1. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3875-1
PMID:25277482
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of current study was to determine whether single-port laparoscopic surgery (SP-LS) improves the health-related quality of life (QoL) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (conventional LS) in women with benign gynecologic disease.

METHODS

We performed a prospective case-control study from October 2010 to December 2012. A total of 273 women with benign gynecologic disease participated in this study, and 135 of them were in the SP-LS group and 138 in the conventional LS. We evaluated QoL after SP-LS or conventional LS. All patients were asked to complete short-form 36 (SF-36) QoL health surveys preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics and operative outcomes showed no significant differences between both groups. SP-LS had no benefits in QoL compared with conventional LS in the main categories, even though SP-LS showed statistically significant higher scores than conventional LS for the role of physical domain at 1 month postoperatively and for social function at 3 months postoperatively. In contrast to this, conventional LS had statistically significant higher scores than SP-LS for role function, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and emotional well-being at 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

With a 6-month follow-up, SP-LS does not offer a QoL benefit over conventional LS in women with benign gynecologic disease. However, a larger prospective randomized study would be required to confirm this.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定在患有良性妇科疾病的女性中,与传统腹腔镜手术(传统腹腔镜手术)相比,单孔腹腔镜手术(SP-LS)是否能改善健康相关生活质量(QoL)。

方法

我们在2010年10月至2012年12月进行了一项前瞻性病例对照研究。共有273例患有良性妇科疾病的女性参与了本研究,其中135例在SP-LS组,138例在传统腹腔镜手术组。我们评估了SP-LS或传统腹腔镜手术后的生活质量。所有患者均被要求在术前以及术后1、3和6个月完成简短健康调查问卷36(SF-36)生活质量调查。

结果

两组的临床特征和手术结果无显著差异。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,SP-LS在主要类别中对生活质量没有益处,尽管SP-LS在术后1个月的身体领域角色和术后3个月的社会功能方面得分在统计学上显著高于传统腹腔镜手术。与此相反,传统腹腔镜手术在术后6个月的角色功能、身体疼痛、总体健康、活力和情感幸福方面得分在统计学上显著高于SP-LS。

结论

经过6个月的随访,对于患有良性妇科疾病的女性,SP-LS在生活质量方面并不优于传统腹腔镜手术。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性随机研究来证实这一点。

相似文献

1
Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗良性妇科疾病后的生活质量比较。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1850-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3875-1. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
2
Does single-port laparoscopic surgery reduce postoperative pain in women with benign gynecologic disease?单孔腹腔镜手术能否减轻患有良性妇科疾病女性的术后疼痛?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):999-1005. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0184. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术美容效果的对比性横断面研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Mar;167(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.012. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
4
Prospective comparison of single port versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的前瞻性比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):590-5. doi: 10.1111/jog.12595. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
A prospective comparison of postoperative pain and quality of life in robotic assisted vs conventional laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜妇科手术术后疼痛和生活质量的前瞻性比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):194.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
6
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments and glove port technique in gynecology: a single surgeon's experience.在妇科中使用传统腹腔镜器械和手套端口技术的腹腔镜单孔手术:一位外科医生的经验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
7
Comparison of symptomatic and quality of life outcomes of laparoscopic versus open antireflux surgery.腹腔镜与开放抗反流手术的症状及生活质量结果比较
Surgery. 1999 Oct;126(4):782-8; discussion 788-9.
8
Skin closure methods after single port laparoscopic surgery: a randomized clinical trial.单孔腹腔镜手术后的皮肤闭合方法:一项随机临床试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
9
Comparison of single-port and three-port laparoscopic salpingectomy in the management for tubal pregnancy.比较单孔腹腔镜与三孔腹腔镜输卵管切除术治疗输卵管妊娠的效果。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2018 May;81(5):469-474. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
10
Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP® surgical system for benign gynecologic disease: A preliminary report.达芬奇 SP®手术系统机器人单孔手术治疗妇科良性疾病的初步报告。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;59(2):243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision.应用东口氏横切口进行减少切口手术的可行性。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gmit.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
Do preoperative depressive symptoms predict quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A longitudinal prospective study.术前抑郁症状是否能预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的生活质量:一项纵向前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0202266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202266. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Does single-port laparoscopic surgery reduce postoperative pain in women with benign gynecologic disease?单孔腹腔镜手术能否减轻患有良性妇科疾病女性的术后疼痛?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):999-1005. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0184. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
2
Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.经单通道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗后的生活质量评估:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1896-906. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2625-5. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
3
A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery.
单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术美容效果的对比性横断面研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Mar;167(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.11.012. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
4
A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of laparoendoscopic single-site access versus conventional 3-port appendectomy.腹腔镜单部位入路与传统三孔阑尾切除术的随机对照双盲试验。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):909-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182765fcf.
5
Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性随机对照试验的中期结果:传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
6
Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases.100 例连续单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术的学习曲线和手术结果。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(4):227-33. doi: 10.1159/000324384. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
7
Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon's experience.单孔腹腔镜手术适用于大多数妇科手术:单外科医生的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2030-5. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
Does conventional or single port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy affect female sexual function?传统腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术或单孔腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术是否影响女性性功能?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Dec;90(12):1410-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01255.x. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
9
A prospective comparison of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy using transumbilical GelPort access and multiport laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.经脐单孔 GelPort 通道腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与多孔腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的前瞻性比较。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):294-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照试验比较单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):22-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182192f89.