Suppr超能文献

根据美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组第三次报告所定义的冠心病危险因素患者的他汀类药物治疗模式及临床概况。

Statin treatment patterns and clinical profile of patients with risk factors for coronary heart disease defined by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III.

作者信息

Kern David M, Balu Sanjeev, Tunceli Ozgur, Anzalone Deborah

机构信息

HealthCore Inc. , Wilmington, DE , USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2443-51. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.971151. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical characteristics, statin treatment patterns and adherence among patients at different risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) as defined by National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years old with ≥ 1 claim for dyslipidemia, ≥ 1 statin claim, or ≥ 1 LDL-C value ≥ 100 mg/dL were identified from 1 January 2007 to 31 July 2012. Patients were classified as low risk (LR) (0-1 risk factor: hypertension, age ≥ 45 years [men] or ≥ 55 years [women], or low HDL-C), moderate/moderately high risk (MR) (≥ 2 risk factors), high risk (HR) (CHD or CHD risk equivalent), or very high risk (VHR) (acute coronary syndrome, or established cardiovascular disease plus diabetes or metabolic syndrome). Medication use and lipid levels during the 12 months before and statin use during the 6 months after index were compared across risk groups.

RESULTS

There were 1,524,351 LR, 242,357 MR, 188,222 HR, and 57,469 VHR patients identified. Statin use was observed in 15% of all patients, but was higher in the VHR group (45%) versus LR (12%), MR (18%), and HR (29%) groups. Simvastatin accounted for 50%-52% of all statin use, and average statin dose was higher among VHR patients compared with all other groups. Adherence was low overall (mean proportion of days covered [PDC]: 0.57), but higher among VHR (0.69) versus others (mean PDC: 0.55, 0.59, and 0.59 in LR, MR, and HR groups, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin treatment was low across all risk groups, and VHR patients had higher doses and better adherence compared with other risk groups. However, adherence was not optimal, indicating a potential limited benefit from statin treatment.

摘要

目的

比较根据美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)成人治疗小组(ATP)III指南定义的不同冠心病(CHD)风险患者的临床特征、他汀类药物治疗模式及依从性。

方法

从2007年1月1日至2012年7月31日,纳入年龄≥18岁、有≥1次血脂异常索赔、≥1次他汀类药物索赔或≥1次低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)值≥100mg/dL的患者。患者被分为低风险(LR)(0-1个风险因素:高血压、年龄≥45岁[男性]或≥55岁[女性],或高密度脂蛋白胆固醇低)、中/中高风险(MR)(≥2个风险因素)、高风险(HR)(冠心病或冠心病风险等同情况)或极高风险(VHR)(急性冠状动脉综合征,或已确诊的心血管疾病加糖尿病或代谢综合征)。比较各风险组在索引前12个月的用药情况和血脂水平以及索引后6个月的他汀类药物使用情况。

结果

共识别出1,524,351例LR患者、242,357例MR患者、188,222例HR患者和57,469例VHR患者。所有患者中15%使用他汀类药物,但VHR组(45%)高于LR组(12%)、MR组(18%)和HR组(29%)。辛伐他汀占所有他汀类药物使用的50%-52%,VHR患者的他汀类药物平均剂量高于所有其他组。总体依从性较低(平均覆盖天数比例[PDC]:0.57),但VHR组(0.69)高于其他组(LR、MR和HR组的平均PDC分别为0.55、0.59和0.59)。

结论

所有风险组的他汀类药物治疗率均较低,与其他风险组相比,VHR患者的剂量更高且依从性更好。然而,依从性并非最佳,表明他汀类药物治疗的潜在益处有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验