1 Boston Health Economics, Waltham, Massachusetts.
2 Sanofi US, Bridgewater, New Jersey.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jun;22(6):685-98. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.6.685.
Widespread use of statins has improved hypercholesterolemia management, yet a significant proportion of patients remain at risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Analyses of treatment patterns reveal inadequate intensity and duration of statin therapy among patients with hypercholesterolemia, and little is known about real-world statin use, specifically in subgroups of patients at high risk for CV events.
To examine patterns of statin use and outcomes among patients with high-risk features who newly initiated statin monotherapy.
Adult patients (aged > 18 years) at high CV risk who received > 1 prescription for statin monotherapy and who had not received lipid-modifying therapy during the previous 12 months were identified from the Truven MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (from January 2007 to June 2013). Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes were hierarchically classified into 5 mutually exclusive CV risk categories (listed here in order from highest to lowest risk): (1) recent CV event (subcategorized by hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome [ACS] or other non-ACS CV event within 90 days of index); (2) coronary heart disease (CHD); (3) history of ischemic stroke; (4) peripheral artery disease (PAD); and (5) diabetes. Outcomes of interest included changes in therapy, proportion of days covered (PDC), time to discontinuation, and proportion of patients with ASCVD-related inpatient visit during the follow-up period. Statin therapy was subdivided into high-intensity treatment (atorvastatin 40 mg or 80 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg or 40 mg, or simvastatin 80 mg) or moderate- to low-intensity treatment (all other statins and statin dosing regimens). Follow-up data were obtained from the index date (statin initiation) until the end of continuous enrollment.
A total of 541,221 patients were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were stratified in the diabetes cohort (61.1%), followed in frequency by recent ACS event (15.8%), recent non-ACS CV event (9.9%), PAD (4.7%), CHD (4.4%), and history of ischemic stroke (4.1%). Only 15.0% of the population initiated therapy with a high-intensity statin, and 22.5% of these high-intensity statin initiators switched to a moderate- to low-intensity regimen during the follow-up period. Median time to statin discontinuation was approximately 15 months. Duration of treatment was longer among those who were treated with a high-intensity versus a moderate- to low-intensity statin regimen (21 and 15 months, respectively). The PDC was highest in the recent ACS hospitalization cohort (66.4%) and lowest in the diabetes cohort (55.5%). The PDC was significantly greater among patients who initiated treatment with a high-intensity statin regimen than with a moderate- to low-intensity statin regimen (62.1% vs. 57.5%, respectively; P< 0.001). At 1 year, Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative rates for ASCVD-related hospitalizations ranged from 3.5% (diabetes) to 21.8% (recent ACS hospitalization).
Patients at high risk for CV events are suboptimally dosed with statins, have high rates of discontinuation, and have low rates of adherence. Despite the use of statin therapy, ASCVD-related inpatient visit rates were high, particularly among those patients at highest risk because of a recent ACS hospitalization. Future interventions are required to ensure that high-risk patients are effectively managed to reduce subsequent morbidity and mortality.
Support for this research was provided by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, and Sanofi US, Bridgewater, New Jersey. Menzin and Lin are employees of Boston Health Economics, which received consulting fees from Sanofi. Friedman is a consultant to Boston Health Economics. Lin, Friedman, and Menzin have received research support from Sanofi US. Sung, Mallya, Panaccio, and Koren are employees of Sanofi US and also have ownership interest in Sanofi US. Sanchez is an employee of and has ownership interest in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Neumann has served on advisory boards for Merck & Co, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Genentech, Novartis, Bayer AG, UCB, Sanofi US, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and Cubist and serves as consultant for Boston Health Economics, Forrest, P urdue, and Smith and Nephew. This research has been presented in part at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 20th Annual International Meeting, May 16-20, 2015, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. All authors contributed to the study design, protocol development, and results interpretation. Lin and Menzin were responsible for conducting the study analyses. All authors were involved in manuscript development and approved the submitted version.
广泛使用他汀类药物改善了高胆固醇血症的管理,但仍有相当一部分患者存在心血管(CV)事件风险。对治疗模式的分析表明,高胆固醇血症患者的他汀类药物治疗强度和持续时间不足,而对于他汀类药物的实际使用情况,特别是在 CV 事件风险较高的患者亚组中,知之甚少。
研究新开始他汀类药物单药治疗的高危特征患者的他汀类药物使用模式和结局。
从 Truven MarketScan 商业和医疗保险补充数据库(2007 年 1 月至 2013 年 6 月)中确定了患有高 CV 风险且接受了> 1 次他汀类药物单药治疗处方但在过去 12 个月内未接受降脂治疗的成年患者(年龄> 18 岁)。患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)或糖尿病的患者按照以下 5 个相互排斥的 CV 风险类别(按风险从高到低的顺序列出)进行分层分类:(1)近期 CV 事件(亚组为 ACS 急性冠状动脉综合征或其他非 ACS CV 事件后 90 天内住院);(2)冠心病(CHD);(3)缺血性卒中史;(4)外周动脉疾病(PAD);(5)糖尿病。感兴趣的结局包括治疗变化、覆盖天数(PDC)、停药时间以及随访期间 ASCVD 相关住院就诊的患者比例。他汀类药物治疗分为高强度治疗(阿托伐他汀 40mg 或 80mg、瑞舒伐他汀 20mg 或 40mg 或辛伐他汀 80mg)或中低强度治疗(所有其他他汀类药物和他汀类药物剂量方案)。随访数据从索引日期(他汀类药物开始治疗)到连续入组结束获得。
共纳入 541221 名患者进行分析。大多数患者分层在糖尿病队列(61.1%),其次是近期 ACS 事件(15.8%)、近期非 ACS CV 事件(9.9%)、PAD(4.7%)、CHD(4.4%)和缺血性卒中史(4.1%)。只有 15.0%的患者开始使用高强度他汀类药物治疗,其中 22.5%的患者在随访期间转为中低强度方案。他汀类药物停药的中位时间约为 15 个月。与接受中低强度他汀类药物治疗的患者相比,接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的患者的治疗持续时间更长(分别为 21 个月和 15 个月)。最近 ACS 住院队列的 PDC 最高(66.4%),糖尿病队列最低(55.5%)。与接受中低强度他汀类药物治疗的患者相比,接受高强度他汀类药物治疗的患者 PDC 更高(分别为 62.1%和 57.5%;P< 0.001)。在 1 年时,ASCVD 相关住院的累积发生率的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值范围从糖尿病(3.5%)到最近 ACS 住院(21.8%)。
高 CV 事件风险患者的他汀类药物剂量不足,停药率高,依从性低。尽管使用了他汀类药物治疗,但 ASCVD 相关住院就诊率仍然很高,尤其是那些最近 ACS 住院的患者,因为他们的风险最高。需要采取未来的干预措施来确保高危患者得到有效管理,以降低随后的发病率和死亡率。
本研究由纽约州塔里敦的 Regeneron 制药公司和新泽西州 Bridgewater 的 Sanofi US 提供支持。Menzin 和 Lin 是波士顿健康经济学公司的员工,该公司从 Sanofi US 获得咨询费。Friedman 是波士顿健康经济学公司的顾问。Lin、Friedman 和 Menzin 从 Sanofi US 获得了研究支持。Sung、Mallya、Panaccio 和 Koren 是 Sanofi US 的员工,并且在 Sanofi US 拥有所有权权益。Sanchez 是 Regeneron 制药公司的员工,并且拥有所有权权益。Neumann 曾担任默克公司、武田制药公司、基因泰克公司、诺华公司、拜耳公司、UCB、Sanofi US、Robert Wood Johnson 基金会和 Cubist 的顾问,并担任波士顿健康经济学公司、Forrest、Purdue 和 Smith & Nephew 的顾问。本研究的部分内容已在 2015 年 5 月 16 日至 20 日在宾夕法尼亚州费城举行的国际药物经济学和结果研究学会第 20 届年会上进行了介绍。所有作者都参与了研究设计、协议制定和结果解释。Lin 和 Menzin 负责进行研究分析。所有作者都参与了手稿的编写并批准了提交的版本。