Duncan Lauren E, Peterson Bill E
a Smith College.
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Nov-Dec;154(6):480-90. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.933764.
Intolerance of ambiguity and cognitive rigidity are unifying aspects of authoritarianism as defined by Adorno, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, and Sanford (1982/1950), who hypothesized that authoritarians view the world in absolute terms (e.g., good or evil). Past studies have documented the relationship between authoritarianism and intolerance of ambiguity and rigidity. Frenkel-Brunswik (1949) hypothesized that this desire for absolutism was rooted in perceptual processes. We present a study with three samples that directly tests the relationship between right wing authoritarianism (RWA) and the processing of ideologically neutral but ambiguous visual stimuli. As hypothesized, in all three samples we found that RWA was related to the slower processing of visual information that required participants to recategorize objects. In a fourth sample, RWA was unrelated to speed of processing visual information that did not require recategorization. Overall, results suggest a relationship between RWA and rigidity in categorization.
如阿多诺、弗伦克尔 - 布伦斯维克、莱文森和桑福德(1982/1950)所定义的那样,对模糊性的不容忍和认知僵化是威权主义的统一特征,他们假设威权主义者以绝对的方式看待世界(例如,善或恶)。过去的研究记录了威权主义与对模糊性的不容忍和僵化之间的关系。弗伦克尔 - 布伦斯维克(1949)假设这种对绝对主义的渴望源于感知过程。我们进行了一项有三个样本的研究,直接测试右翼威权主义(RWA)与对意识形态上中立但模糊的视觉刺激的处理之间的关系。正如所假设的那样,在所有三个样本中,我们发现RWA与处理需要参与者重新分类物体的视觉信息的较慢速度有关。在第四个样本中,RWA与处理不需要重新分类的视觉信息的速度无关。总体而言,结果表明RWA与分类僵化之间存在关系。