• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过人格和危险世界信仰预测右翼威权主义:直接、间接和交互作用。

Predicting right-wing authoritarianism via personality and dangerous world beliefs: direct, indirect, and interactive effects.

机构信息

University of Torino, Italy.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan-Feb;152(1):112-27. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.565384.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.2011.565384
PMID:22308764
Abstract

In an Italian sample (N = 483, 78.23% women, mean age = 27.61 years old), we used structural equation modeling with latent variables and interactions to analyze the direct, indirect, and interactive effects exerted on right-wing authoritarianism by the Big Five factors of personality and by dangerous world beliefs. Openness, Neuroticism, and Conscientiousness exerted direct effects on right-wing authoritarianism; the first two relationships were partially mediated by dangerous world beliefs. Most importantly, the relationship between dangerous world beliefs and right-wing authoritarianism was moderated by Openness: dangerous world beliefs significantly influenced right-wing authoritarianism solely for participants high in Openness. Limitations and possible developments of this research are discussed.

摘要

在一个意大利样本中(N=483,78.23%为女性,平均年龄为 27.61 岁),我们使用结构方程模型和潜在变量及交互作用来分析人格的五大因素和危险世界信念对右翼威权主义的直接、间接和交互影响。开放性、神经质和尽责性对右翼威权主义有直接影响;前两个关系部分通过危险世界信念来中介。最重要的是,危险世界信念与右翼威权主义的关系受到开放性的调节:危险世界信念仅对开放性高的参与者产生显著影响。讨论了这项研究的局限性和可能的发展方向。

相似文献

1
Predicting right-wing authoritarianism via personality and dangerous world beliefs: direct, indirect, and interactive effects.通过人格和危险世界信仰预测右翼威权主义:直接、间接和交互作用。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan-Feb;152(1):112-27. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.565384.
2
The personality bases of ideology: a one-year longitudinal study.意识形态的人格基础:一项为期一年的纵向研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;150(5):540-59. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365364.
3
Right-wing authoritarianism and conspiracy thinking in a Polish sample.波兰样本中的右翼威权主义与阴谋论思维
Psychol Rep. 2009 Oct;105(2):389-93. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.2.389-393.
4
Does the DOG scale measure dogmatism? Another look at construct validity.DOG量表能测量教条主义吗?对结构效度的再审视。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;149(3):365-83. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.3.365-383.
5
Big-five personality, social worldviews, and ideological attitudes: further tests of a dual process cognitive-motivational model.大五人格、社会世界观和意识形态态度:双过程认知动机模型的进一步检验。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;149(5):545-61. doi: 10.1080/00224540903232308.
6
Personality and parenting style in parents of adolescents.青少年父母的个性和育儿风格。
J Adolesc. 2010 Jun;33(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
7
[The influence of socio-demographic factors on personality dimensions in the elderly].[社会人口学因素对老年人个性维度的影响]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Apr;36(2):130-7. doi: 10.1007/s00391-003-0085-1.
8
The genetic and environmental relationship between major depression and the five-factor model of personality.重性抑郁与五因素人格模型的遗传与环境关系。
Psychol Med. 2010 May;40(5):801-6. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991140. Epub 2009 Sep 7.
9
Endorsement of sexist ideology in Taiwan and the United States: social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and deferential family norms.台湾和美国对性别歧视意识形态的认可:社会支配取向、右翼独裁主义和恭敬的家庭规范。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):254-62. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.645485. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
10
Openness, right-wing authoritarianism, and antigay prejudice in college students: a mediational model.大学生的开放性、右翼权威主义和反同偏见:一个中介模型。
J Couns Psychol. 2013 Jan;60(1):64-71. doi: 10.1037/a0031090.

引用本文的文献

1
Who values competent minds and who likes warm hearts? The role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in shaping voter preferences for political candidates.谁看重有能力的头脑,谁喜欢温暖的心?右翼威权主义和社会支配取向在塑造选民对政治候选人的偏好中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70004. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70004.
2
Communication training is inadequate: the role of deception, non-verbal communication, and cultural proficiency.沟通培训不足:欺骗、非言语沟通和文化能力的作用。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1820228. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1820228.