Suppr超能文献

青少年体重批评两种测量方法的比较:与身体活动参与度、态度、体重状况及健康相关生活质量的关联

Comparison of two measures of weight criticism in youth: associations with physical activity engagement and attitudes, weight status, and health-related quality of life.

作者信息

Gayes Laurie A, Steele Ric G

机构信息

Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas.

Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas

出版信息

J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Mar;40(2):228-37. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu080. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the degree to which 2 measures of weight criticism, the Weight Criticism During Physical Activity (WCA) scale and the Perceptions of Teasing Scale (POTS), represent distinct constructs and in what circumstances each is most appropriately used. A community sample of 307 fourth and fifth graders completed these measures, as well as measures of health-related quality of life, physical activity engagement, and attitudes toward physical activity. Body mass index was also calculated. Results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the WCA scale and the POTS represented correlated but distinct constructs and related differently to measures of physical activity and weight status. Findings suggested that the WCA scale may be representing criticism regarding athletic competency, not criticism of weight status as described in the literature. The POTS subscales appear to be accurately described and used in the literature.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验两种体重批评测量方法,即体育活动期间的体重批评(WCA)量表和被嘲笑感知量表(POTS),在多大程度上代表不同的构念,以及每种方法在何种情况下最适用。一个由307名四年级和五年级学生组成的社区样本完成了这些测量,以及与健康相关的生活质量、体育活动参与度和对体育活动态度的测量。还计算了体重指数。验证性因素分析结果表明,WCA量表和POTS代表相关但不同的构念,并且与体育活动和体重状况测量的相关性不同。研究结果表明,WCA量表可能代表对运动能力的批评,而非如文献中所述的对体重状况的批评。POTS子量表在文献中似乎得到了准确的描述和应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验