• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科的性史采集——需要更高的特异性。

Sexual history taking in the emergency department - more specificity required.

作者信息

Jenkins Wiley D, LeVault Kelsey R

机构信息

Center for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois; Family and Community Medicine, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.

Center for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.051. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.051
PMID:25282115
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the most reported diseases in the United States, and emergency departments (ED) serve a population presenting with increased infection risk. However, identifying patients for whom sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening is appropriate requires accurate sexual history reporting.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine the consistency with which ED patients answer general and specific sexual activity questions, and how responses relate to perceived STI risk.

METHODS

Urban ED patients aged 15-34 years completed a sexual history survey containing sexual activity and perceived infection risk questions and provided urine and pharyngeal specimens for CT/GC analysis.

RESULTS

Participants included 192 males and 301 females with a mean age of 25.2 years and were 65.7% white and 33.3% black. Thirty-eight (7.7%) were infected with CT or GC. In patients denying sexual activity in the past year (general question), 40.7% of such males and 45.0% of females also reported some form of specific sexual activity (activity misclassification). Among self-identified heterosexuals, 7.2% males and 7.5% females reported some form of homosexual activity (orientation misclassification; OM). OM individuals were more likely to perceive themselves at risk of infection both orally (odds ratio 2.92, confidence interval 1.12-7.63) and genitally (odds ratio 3.36, confidence interval 1.55-7.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Given that reported sexual activity and age are the only criteria for routine female screening, and that homosexual activity is one of the few screening criteria for males, our results show that a substantial proportion of ED patients eligible for screening may not be identified by reliance upon general sexual history questions.

摘要

背景

沙眼衣原体(CT)和淋病奈瑟菌(GC)是美国报告最多的疾病,急诊科(ED)接待的人群感染风险较高。然而,要确定适合进行性传播感染(STI)筛查的患者,需要准确的性史报告。

研究目的

研究急诊科患者回答一般性和特异性性行为问题的一致性,以及这些回答与感知到的性传播感染风险之间的关系。

方法

15至34岁的城市急诊科患者完成了一项性史调查,其中包含性行为和感知感染风险问题,并提供尿液和咽拭子样本用于CT/GC分析。

结果

参与者包括192名男性和301名女性,平均年龄为25.2岁,65.7%为白人,33.3%为黑人。38人(7.7%)感染了CT或GC。在过去一年否认有性行为(一般性问题)的患者中,40.7%的男性和45.0%的女性也报告了某种形式的特异性性行为(行为错误分类)。在自我认定为异性恋的人群中,7.2%的男性和7.5%的女性报告了某种形式的同性恋行为(性取向错误分类;OM)。OM个体更有可能认为自己有口腔感染风险(优势比2.92,置信区间1.12 - 7.63)和生殖器感染风险(优势比3.36,置信区间1.55 - 7.30)。

结论

鉴于报告的性行为和年龄是常规女性筛查的唯一标准,而同性恋行为是男性少数筛查标准之一,我们的结果表明,依靠一般性史问题可能无法识别出很大一部分符合筛查条件的急诊科患者。

相似文献

1
Sexual history taking in the emergency department - more specificity required.急诊科的性史采集——需要更高的特异性。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.051. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
2
Universal Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections among Asymptomatic Adolescents in an Urban Emergency Department: High Acceptance but Low Prevalence of Infection.城市急诊科无症状青少年性传播感染的普遍筛查:接受度高但感染率低
J Pediatr. 2016 Apr;171:128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
Cross-sectional study of pharyngeal and genital chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections in emergency department patients.横断面研究:急诊科患者咽和生殖道衣原体及淋病感染。
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May;90(3):246-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051358. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
Screening for Asymptomatic Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in the Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科无症状淋病和衣原体的筛查
Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Apr;43(4):209-15. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000424.
5
Impact of sexual assault nurse examiners on the evaluation of sexual assault in a pediatric emergency department.性侵犯护士检查员对儿科急诊科性侵犯评估的影响。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jul;24(7):442-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31817de11d.
6
Evaluation and management of sexually transmitted infections in adolescent males presenting to a pediatric emergency department: is the chief complaint diagnostic?儿科急诊科就诊的青春期男性性传播感染的评估与管理:主诉具有诊断价值吗?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Nov;27(11):1042-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318235e950.
7
Self-administered vaginal swabs are a feasible alternative to physician-assisted cervical swabs for sexually transmitted infection screening in the emergency department.在急诊科进行性传播感染筛查时,自行采集阴道拭子是医生辅助采集宫颈拭子的一种可行替代方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;16(4):360-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00359.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
8
Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10-24 years - United States, 2002-2007.2002 - 2007年美国10 - 24岁人群的性与生殖健康
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009 Jul 17;58(6):1-58.
9
Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis infection in symptomatic adolescent females presenting to a pediatric emergency department.就诊于儿科急诊的有症状青少年女性阴道毛滴虫感染的流行率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jul;18(7):763-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01111.x.
10
Patterns of chlamydia/gonorrhea positivity among voluntarily screened New York City public high school students.自愿接受筛查的纽约市公立高中生中衣原体/淋病阳性模式。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Sep;49(3):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowing the unknown: The underestimation of monkeypox cases. Insights and implications from an integrative review of the literature.认识未知:猴痘病例的低估。文献综合综述的见解与启示。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Sep 23;13:1011049. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1011049. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study.患者与医生对急诊科艾滋病毒筛查的看法:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 21;12(7):e0180389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180389. eCollection 2017.