• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术:一项系统评价

Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kontovounisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/codi.12793.

DOI:10.1111/codi.12793
PMID:25283236
Abstract

AIM

Several studies have suggested an increased lymph node yield, reduced locoregional recurrence and increased disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colorectal cancer. This review was undertaken to assess the use of CME for colon cancer by evaluating the technique and its clinical outcome.

METHOD

A literature search of publications was performed using PubMed and Medline. Only studies published in English were included. Studies assessed for quality and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. End-points included number of lymph nodes per patient, quality of the plane of mesocolic excision, postoperative mortality and morbidity, 5-year locoregional recurrence and 5-year cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

There were 34 articles comprising 12 retrospective studies, nine prospective studies and 13 original articles including case series, observational studies and editorials. Of the prospective studies, four reported an increased lymph node harvest and a survival benefit. The others reported an improvement in the quality of the specimen as assessed by histopathological examination. Laparoscopic CME has the same oncological outcome as open surgery but completeness of excision during laparoscopy may be compromised for tumours in the transverse colon.

CONCLUSION

Studies demonstrate that CME removes significantly more tissue around the tumour including maximal lymph node clearance. There is little information on serious adverse events after CME and a long-term survival benefit has not been proved.

摘要

目的

多项研究表明,结直肠癌行完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)后,淋巴结获取数量增加,局部区域复发减少,无病生存期延长。本综述旨在通过评估CME技术及其临床结果,来评价其在结肠癌治疗中的应用。

方法

使用PubMed和Medline对出版物进行文献检索。仅纳入以英文发表的研究。由两名独立的审阅者对研究进行质量评估并提取数据。终点指标包括每位患者的淋巴结数量、结肠系膜切除平面的质量、术后死亡率和发病率、5年局部区域复发率以及5年癌症特异性生存率。

结果

共有34篇文章,包括12项回顾性研究、9项前瞻性研究以及13篇原创文章,后者包括病例系列、观察性研究和社论。在前瞻性研究中,4项报告了淋巴结获取数量增加及生存获益。其他研究报告了经组织病理学检查评估的标本质量有所改善。腹腔镜CME与开放手术具有相同的肿瘤学结局,但对于横结肠癌,腹腔镜手术期间的切除完整性可能会受到影响。

结论

研究表明,CME能显著切除肿瘤周围更多组织,包括最大程度的淋巴结清扫。关于CME术后严重不良事件的信息较少,且尚未证实其具有长期生存获益。

相似文献

1
Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.结直肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术:一项系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/codi.12793.
2
Complete mesocolic excision an assessment of feasibility and outcome.完整结肠系膜切除术:可行性与结果评估
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
3
Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision.沿胚胎学平面进行的结肠癌手术:完整结肠系膜切除术的系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1577-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2626-2. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
4
Open compared with laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放性手术与腹腔镜全结肠系膜切除术加中央淋巴结清扫术治疗结肠癌的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;18(7):O224-35. doi: 10.1111/codi.13385.
5
Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术的右半结肠切除术是安全的,可增加淋巴结检出量并提高生存率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Oct;25(10):1099-1113. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02471-2. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
6
Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术行右半结肠切除术:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):979-993. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02853-8. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
7
Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival.完整结肠系膜切除术和中央血管结扎在右半结肠癌中的 D3 淋巴结清扫术:术后结局、肿瘤复发和总生存的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):4945-4955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08529-4. Epub 2021 May 11.
8
Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌:是否有必要行 D3 淋巴结清扫?
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/codi.16815. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
9
Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术与非完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌患者的安全性、质量和效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):962-972. doi: 10.1111/codi.13900.
10
Complete mesocolic excision versus standard resection for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative safety and an evaluation of the use of a robotic approach.完整结肠系膜切除术与标准切除术治疗结肠癌的比较:围手术期安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及对机器人手术应用的评估。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02838-7. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of chyle leakage between laparoscopic and open colectomy in patients with colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放结肠癌切除术患者乳糜漏的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Coloproctol. 2025 Aug;41(4):262-270. doi: 10.3393/ac.2025.00045.0006. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
2
A single-center retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of a modified regimen of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) with molecular targeting agents as second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with recurrent or nonresectable colorectal cancer.一项针对日本复发性或不可切除结直肠癌患者,以伊立替康联合S-1改良方案(IRIS)加分子靶向药物作为二线化疗的疗效和安全性的单中心回顾性分析。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Apr 29;14(2):663-675. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-899. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
Higher Numbers of Examined Lymph Nodes Are Associated with Increased Survival in Resected, Treatment-Naïve, Node-Positive Esophageal, Gastric, Pancreatic, and Colon Cancers.在接受根治性治疗且未经治疗的淋巴结阳性食管、胃、胰腺和结直肠癌患者中,检查的淋巴结数量较多与生存时间延长相关。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1197-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05617-9. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Pattern of recurrence and survival after D2 right colectomy for cancer: is there place for a routine more extended lymphadenectomy?D2 右半结肠癌根治术后复发模式和生存分析:常规扩大淋巴结清扫是否有必要?
Updates Surg. 2022 Aug;74(4):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01317-2. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Mid-term oncological outcomes after complete versus conventional mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除与传统结肠系膜切除的中期肿瘤学结果比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6489-6496. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-09001-z. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Robotic complete mesocolic excision versus conventional robotic right colectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a comparative study of perioperative outcomes.机器人全结肠系膜切除术与传统机器人右半结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌:围手术期结局的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2113-2120. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08498-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Prospective study of oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic modified complete mesocolic excision for non-metastatic right colon cancer (PIONEER study): study protocol of a multicentre single-arm trial.腹腔镜改良全结肠系膜切除术治疗非转移性右半结肠癌的肿瘤学结局的前瞻性研究(PIONEER 研究):多中心单臂试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07151-2.
8
Minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation (CME/CVL) for right colon cancer.右半结肠癌的微创全结肠系膜切除及中央血管结扎术(CME/CVL)
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Jun;11(3):491-499. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.11.08.
9
Long-term outcomes after complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理中心行完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的长期结果。
Ann Saudi Med. 2020 May-Jun;40(3):207-211. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.207. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
Robotic complete mesocolic excision using indocyanine fluorescence imaging in colorectal cancer: A case study and technical approach.使用吲哚菁绿荧光成像的机器人全结肠系膜切除术治疗结直肠癌:病例研究及技术方法
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;69:32-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.01.038. Epub 2020 Feb 6.