Tillein J, Hartmann R, Kral A
Institute of AudioNeuroTechnology, & Dept. of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Medical University Hannover, Germany; ENT Clinics, J.W.Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; MedEl Comp., Innsbruck, Austria.
Institute of AudioNeuroTechnology, & Dept. of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Medical University Hannover, Germany.
Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:112-26. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
The present study investigates interactions of simultaneous electric and acoustic stimulation in single auditory nerve fibers in normal hearing cats. First, the auditory nerve was accessed with a microelectrode and response areas of single nerve fibers were determined for acoustic stimulation. Second, response thresholds to extracochlear sinusoidal electric stimulation using ball electrodes positioned at the round window were measured. Third, interactions that occurred with combined electric-acoustic stimulation were investigated in two areas: (1) the spectral domain (frequency response areas) and (2) the temporal domain (phase-locking to each stimulus) at moderate stimulus intensities (electric: 6 dB re threshold, acoustic: 20-40 dB re threshold at the characteristic frequency, CF). For fibers responding to both modalities responses to both electric and acoustic stimulation could be clearly identified. CFs, thresholds, and bandwidth (Q10dB) of acoustic responses were not significantly affected by simultaneous electric stimulation. Phase-locking of electric responses decreased in the presence of acoustic stimulation. Indication for electric stimulation of inner hair cells with 125 and 250 Hz were observed. However, these did not disturb the acoustic receptive fields of auditory nerve fibers. There was a trade-off between these responses when the intensities of the stimulation were varied: Relatively more intense stimulation dominated less intense stimulation. The scarcity of interaction between the different stimulus modalities demonstrates the ability of electric-acoustic stimulation to transfer useful information through both stimulation channels at the same time despite cochlear electrophonic effects. Application of 30 Hz electric stimulation resulted in a strong suppression of acoustic activity in the anodic phase of the stimulus. An electric stimulation like this might thus be used to control acoustic responses. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled
本研究调查了正常听力猫的单根听神经纤维中同时进行电刺激和声刺激时的相互作用。首先,用微电极接入听神经,确定单根神经纤维对声刺激的反应区域。其次,测量使用置于圆窗的球形电极进行的耳蜗外正弦电刺激的反应阈值。第三,在两个方面研究了电-声联合刺激时发生的相互作用:(1)频谱域(频率反应区域)和(2)中等刺激强度(电刺激:阈值以上6 dB,声刺激:在特征频率CF处阈值以上20 - 40 dB)下的时域(对每个刺激的锁相)。对于对两种刺激方式均有反应的纤维,电刺激和声刺激的反应均可清晰识别。同时进行电刺激时,声反应的特征频率、阈值和带宽(Q10dB)未受到显著影响。存在声刺激时,电反应的锁相性降低。观察到对内侧毛细胞进行125 Hz和250 Hz电刺激的迹象。然而,这些并未干扰听神经纤维的声感受野。当刺激强度变化时,这些反应之间存在权衡:相对较强的刺激占主导地位,较弱的刺激则受到抑制。不同刺激方式之间相互作用较少,这表明尽管存在耳蜗电声效应,电-声刺激仍能够同时通过两种刺激通道传递有用信息。施加30 Hz电刺激会在刺激的阳极相强烈抑制声活动。这样的电刺激因此可用于控制声反应。本文是名为<拉斯克奖>的特刊的一部分。