• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较等级反应模型的比分检验和其他局部相依性诊断方法。

Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model.

作者信息

Liu Yang, Thissen David

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Nov;67(3):496-513. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12030. Epub 2013 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12030
PMID:25286229
Abstract

Score tests for identifying locally dependent item pairs have been proposed for binary item response models. In this article, both the bifactor and the threshold shift score tests are generalized to the graded response model. For the bifactor test, the generalization is straightforward; it adds one secondary dimension associated only with one pair of items. For the threshold shift test, however, multiple generalizations are possible: in particular, conditional, uniform, and linear shift tests are discussed in this article. Simulation studies show that all of the score tests have accurate Type I error rates given large enough samples, although their small-sample behaviour is not as good as that of Pearson's Χ2 and M2 as proposed in other studies for the purpose of local dependence (LD) detection. All score tests have the highest power to detect the LD which is consistent with their parametric form, and in this case they are uniformly more powerful than Χ2 and M2 ; even wrongly specified score tests are more powerful than Χ2 and M2 in most conditions. An example using empirical data is provided for illustration.

摘要

针对二元项目反应模型,已提出用于识别局部相关项目对的计分检验。在本文中,双因素计分检验和阈值移动计分检验都被推广到了等级反应模型。对于双因素检验,推广很直接;它增加了一个仅与一对项目相关的次要维度。然而,对于阈值移动检验,有多种推广方式:特别是,本文讨论了条件、均匀和线性移动检验。模拟研究表明,在样本量足够大的情况下,所有计分检验的第一类错误率都是准确的,尽管它们的小样本行为不如其他研究中为检测局部相依性(LD)而提出的Pearson卡方检验和M2检验。所有计分检验在检测与它们的参数形式一致的LD时具有最高的功效,在这种情况下,它们比卡方检验和M2检验具有一致更强的功效;即使是错误设定的计分检验在大多数情况下也比卡方检验和M2检验更有功效。提供了一个使用实证数据的例子进行说明。

相似文献

1
Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model.比较等级反应模型的比分检验和其他局部相依性诊断方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Nov;67(3):496-513. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12030. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
2
Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.项目反应和反应时间模型的边缘似然推断。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 Nov;63(Pt 3):603-26. doi: 10.1348/000711009X481360. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
3
A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.一种多维项目反应理论中维度评估的广义维差异度量。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2011 May;64(Pt 2):208-32. doi: 10.1348/000711010X500483.
4
Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.使用边际模型检验涉及克朗巴哈系数的假设。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 Nov;66(3):503-20. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12010. Epub 2013 May 13.
5
Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.在多维拉施模型应用中用于检测单维性的似然比差异(G2 Diff)检验的性能。
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(3):267-75.
6
[Estimation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory].[项目反应理论背景下克朗巴哈α系数的估计]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2002 Aug;73(3):227-33. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.73.227.
7
Use of the Lagrange Multiplier Test for Assessing Measurement Invariance Under Model Misspecification.在模型设定错误情况下使用拉格朗日乘数检验评估测量不变性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):254-280. doi: 10.1177/00131644211020355. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
8
The effect of ignoring item interactions on the estimated discrimination parameters in item response theory.在项目反应理论中,忽略项目间交互作用对估计的区分参数的影响。
Psychol Methods. 2001 Jun;6(2):181-95. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.181.
9
Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.层次项目因子模型的有限信息拟合优度检验。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 May;66(2):245-76. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02050.x. Epub 2012 May 29.
10
Semi-parametric proportional hazards models with crossed random effects for psychometric response times.用于心理测量反应时间的具有交叉随机效应的半参数比例风险模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 May;67(2):304-27. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12020. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Supervisor Cultural Humility and Supervisee Nondisclosure: The Supervisory Working Alliance Matters.督导者的文化谦逊与被督导者的保密:督导工作联盟很重要。
Couns Psychol. 2023 May;51(4):590-620. doi: 10.1177/00110000231159316. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
2
Use of the Lagrange Multiplier Test for Assessing Measurement Invariance Under Model Misspecification.在模型设定错误情况下使用拉格朗日乘数检验评估测量不变性。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2022 Apr;82(2):254-280. doi: 10.1177/00131644211020355. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Restricted Recalibration of Item Response Theory Models.
项目反应理论模型的受限再校准。
Psychometrika. 2019 Jun;84(2):529-553. doi: 10.1007/s11336-019-09667-4. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
4
Mutual Information Reliability for Latent Class Analysis.潜在类别分析的互信息可靠性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Sep;42(6):460-477. doi: 10.1177/0146621617748324. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
5
On Lagrange Multiplier Tests in Multidimensional Item Response Theory: Information Matrices and Model Misspecification.关于多维项目反应理论中的拉格朗日乘数检验:信息矩阵与模型误设
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Aug;78(4):653-678. doi: 10.1177/0013164417714506. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Critical Values for Yen's : Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.严氏临界值:使用残差相关性识别拉施模型中的局部依赖性
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):178-194. doi: 10.1177/0146621616677520. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
7
Methodological Issues in Examining Measurement Equivalence in Patient Reported Outcomes Measures: Methods Overview to the Two-Part Series, "Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Forms".患者报告结局测量中检验测量等效性的方法学问题:“患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)简表的测量等效性”两部分系列概述。
Psychol Test Assess Model. 2016;58(1):37-78.
8
Generalized Fiducial Inference for Logistic Graded Response Models.广义似然比推断在逻辑累进反应模型中的应用。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1097-1125. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9554-0. Epub 2017 Feb 21.