From the Studies Coordinating Centre, Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (A.H., L.T., Y.-M.G., L.J., Z.-Y.Z., Y.-P.L., J.A.S.); Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (K.A.); Centre for Environmental Sciences, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium (T.S.N.); and Research and Development Group VitaK, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (J.A.S.).
Hypertension. 2015 Jan;65(1):62-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04023. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
In view of the declining environmental lead exposure in the United States, we analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003-2010) for association of blood pressure and hypertension with blood lead. The 12 725 participants included 21.1% blacks, 20.5% Hispanics, 58.4% whites, and 48.7% women. Blacks compared with non-Blacks had higher systolic and diastolic pressures (126.5 versus 123.9 and 71.9 versus 69.6 mm Hg) and higher hypertension prevalence (44.7 versus 36.8%). Blood lead was lower in whites than in non-whites (1.46 versus 1.57 μg/dL) and in women than in men (1.25 versus 1.80 μg/dL). In multivariable analyses of all participants, blood lead doubling was associated with higher (P≤0.0007) systolic and diastolic pressure (+0.76 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.13 and +0.43 mm Hg; 0.18-0.68), but not with the odds of hypertension (0.95; 0.90-1.01; P=0.11). Associations with blood lead were nonsignificant (P≥0.09) for systolic pressure in women and for diastolic pressure in non-whites. Among men, systolic pressure increased with blood lead (P≤0.060) with effect sizes associated with blood lead doubling ranging from +0.65 mm Hg in whites to +1.61 mm Hg in blacks. For systolic pressure, interactions of ethnicity and sex with blood lead were all significant (P≤0.019). In conclusion, small and inconsistent effect sizes in the associations of blood pressure with blood lead likely exclude current environmental lead exposure as a major hypertension cause in the United States.
鉴于美国环境铅暴露水平下降,我们分析了 2003-2010 年的全国健康和营养调查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,NHANES)数据,以探讨血液铅与血压和高血压之间的关联。该研究共纳入 12725 名参与者,其中 21.1%为黑人,20.5%为西班牙裔,58.4%为白人,48.7%为女性。与非黑人相比,黑人的收缩压和舒张压更高(126.5 比 123.9mmHg 和 71.9 比 69.6mmHg),高血压患病率更高(44.7%比 36.8%)。与非白人相比,白人的血铅水平较低(1.46 比 1.57μg/dL),与男性相比,女性的血铅水平较低(1.25 比 1.80μg/dL)。在所有参与者的多变量分析中,血铅水平翻倍与收缩压和舒张压升高相关(P≤0.0007),分别增加 0.76mmHg(95%置信区间:0.38-1.13mmHg 和 0.43mmHg;0.18-0.68mmHg),但与高血压的几率无关(0.95;0.90-1.01;P=0.11)。血铅与女性收缩压和非白人舒张压之间的关联无统计学意义(P≥0.09)。在男性中,收缩压随血铅水平升高而升高(P≤0.060),血铅水平翻倍与收缩压增加相关的效应大小范围从白人的+0.65mmHg 到黑人的+1.61mmHg。对于收缩压,种族和性别与血铅之间的交互作用均有统计学意义(P≤0.019)。综上所述,血液铅与血压之间关联的效应较小且不一致,这可能排除了当前环境铅暴露是美国高血压的主要病因。