Suppr超能文献

犬骨盆肢骨科手术中硬膜外麻醉与鞘内麻醉的比较。

Comparison of epidural versus intrathecal anaesthesia in dogs undergoing pelvic limb orthopaedic surgery.

作者信息

Sarotti Diego, Rabozzi Roberto, Franci Paolo

机构信息

Centro Veterinario Fossanese, Fossano, Italy.

Clinica Veterinaria Roma Sud, Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2015 Jul;42(4):405-13. doi: 10.1111/vaa.12229. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the procedural failure rate (PFR), intraoperative rescue analgesia (iRA) probability and postoperative duration of motor block after epidural and intrathecal anaesthesia in dogs undergoing pelvic limb orthopaedic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial.

ANIMALS

Ninety-two client-owned dogs.

METHODS

Dogs were assigned randomly to receive either lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia (EA) (bupivacaine 0.5% and morphine 1%) or intrathecal anaesthesia with the same drugs in a hyperbaric solution (HIA). Inaccurate positioning of the needle, assessed by radiographic imaging, and lack of cerebral spinal fluid outflow were considered procedural failures (PFs) of EA and HIA, respectively. Fentanyl (1 μg kg(-1) IV) was provided for intraoperative rescue analgesia, when either the heart rate or the mean arterial pressure increased by 30% above the pre-stimulation value. Its use was recorded as a sign of intraoperative analgesic failure. The motor block resolution was evaluated postoperatively. Variables were compared using Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kaplan-Meier 'survival' analysis as relevant.

RESULTS

The PFRs in the EA and HIA groups were 15/47 (32%) and 3/45 (7%), respectively (p = 0.003). Differences in iRA were analysed in 26 and 30 subjects in the EA and HIA groups respectively, using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The iRA probability within the first 80 minutes of needle injection (NI) was higher in the EA group (p = 0.045). The incidence of dogs walking within 3 hours of NI was significantly higher in the HIA group (8/20, 40%) than in the EA group (0/17) (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

HIA was found to have lower PF, lower intraoperative analgesic failure and faster motor block resolution. In this study HIA was shown to provide some advantages over EA in dogs undergoing commonly performed pelvic limb orthopaedic surgery in a day-hospital regime.

摘要

目的

比较接受盆腔肢体骨科手术的犬只在硬膜外麻醉和鞘内麻醉后的手术失败率(PFR)、术中补救镇痛(iRA)概率及术后运动阻滞持续时间。

研究设计

前瞻性随机临床试验。

动物

92只客户拥有的犬只。

方法

犬只被随机分配接受腰骶部硬膜外麻醉(EA)(0.5%布比卡因和1%吗啡)或使用相同药物的高压溶液进行鞘内麻醉(HIA)。通过影像学检查评估针定位不准确以及脑脊液流出不畅,分别被视为EA和HIA的手术失败(PF)。当心率或平均动脉压比刺激前值升高30%以上时,静脉注射芬太尼(1μg/kg)用于术中补救镇痛。其使用被记录为术中镇痛失败的标志。术后评估运动阻滞的消退情况。根据情况使用Fisher精确检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Kaplan-Meier“生存”分析对变量进行比较。

结果

EA组和HIA组的PFR分别为15/47(32%)和3/45(7%)(p = 0.003)。分别对EA组的26只和HIA组的30只受试者使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析来分析iRA的差异。EA组在注射针(NI)后的前80分钟内iRA概率更高(p = 0.045)。NI后3小时内犬只行走的发生率在HIA组(8/20,40%)显著高于EA组(0/17)(p = 0.004)。

结论及临床意义

发现HIA的PF较低、术中镇痛失败率较低且运动阻滞消退更快。在本研究中,对于在日间医院接受常见盆腔肢体骨科手术治疗的犬只,HIA显示出比EA具有一些优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验