Suppr超能文献

胰十二指肠切除术中腹腔引流的循证困境——一项系统评价与Meta分析

The evidence based dilemma of intraperitoneal drainage for pancreatic resection - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Nitsche Ulrich, Müller Tara C, Späth Christoph, Cresswell Lynne, Wilhelm Dirk, Friess Helmut, Michalski Christoph W, Kleeff Jörg

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2014 Oct 8;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-76.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Routine placement of intraperitoneal drains has been shown to be ineffective or potentially harmful in various abdominal surgical procedures. Studies assessing risks and benefits of abdominal drains for pancreatic resections have demonstrated inconsistent results. We thus performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analyzed outcomes of pancreatic resections with and without intraoperative placement of drains.

METHODS

A database search according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed for studies on pancreatic resection with and without intraperitoneal drainage. The subgroup 'pancreaticoduodenectomy' was analyzed separately. The quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS and STROBE criteria. Pooled estimates of morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay were calculated using random effects models.

RESULTS

Only two randomized trials were identified. Their results were contradictory. We thus included six further, retrospective studies in the meta-analysis. However, with I2 = 68% for any kind of complication, the estimate of inter-study heterogeneity was high. While overall morbidity after any kind of pancreatic resection was lower without drains (p = 0.04), there was no significant difference in mortality rates. In contrast, pooled estimates of outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy demonstrated no differences in morbidity (p = 0.40) but increased rates of intraabdominal abscesses (p = 0.04) and mortality (p = 0.04) without intraperitoneal drainage.

CONCLUSION

Although drains are associated with slightly increased morbidity for pancreatic resections, routine omission of drains cannot be advocated, especially after pancreaticoduodenectomy. While selective drainage seems reasonable, further efforts to generate more reliable data are questionable because of the current studies and the presumed small differences in outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Systematic review registration number CRD42014007497.

摘要

背景

在各种腹部外科手术中,常规放置腹腔引流管已被证明无效或具有潜在危害。评估腹部引流管对胰腺切除术风险和益处的研究结果并不一致。因此,我们对文献进行了系统回顾,并对术中放置引流管和未放置引流管的胰腺切除术结果进行了荟萃分析。

方法

根据PRISMA指南进行数据库检索,以查找有关有或无腹腔引流的胰腺切除术的研究。对“胰十二指肠切除术”亚组进行单独分析。使用MINORS和STROBE标准评估研究质量。使用随机效应模型计算合并的发病率、死亡率和住院时间估计值。

结果

仅确定了两项随机试验。它们的结果相互矛盾。因此,我们在荟萃分析中纳入了另外六项回顾性研究。然而,对于任何类型的并发症,I2 = 68%,研究间异质性估计值较高。虽然未放置引流管时任何类型胰腺切除术后的总体发病率较低(p = 0.04),但死亡率没有显著差异。相比之下,胰十二指肠切除术后结果的合并估计值显示,未进行腹腔引流时发病率无差异(p = 0.40),但腹腔内脓肿发生率(p = 0.04)和死亡率(p = 0.04)有所增加。

结论

尽管引流管与胰腺切除术的发病率略有增加相关,但不提倡常规不放置引流管,尤其是在胰十二指肠切除术后。虽然选择性引流似乎合理,但由于目前的研究以及结果中假定的微小差异,进一步努力生成更可靠的数据仍存在疑问。

试验注册

系统评价注册号CRD42014007497。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d7/4193685/b40a83150604/1471-2482-14-76-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验