Bosse Jens B, Virding Stina, Thiberge Stephan Y, Scherer Julian, Wodrich Harald, Ruzsics Zsolt, Koszinowski Ulrich H, Enquist Lynn W
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
mBio. 2014 Oct 7;5(5):e01909-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01909-14.
A considerable part of the herpesvirus life cycle takes place in the host nucleus. While much progress has been made to understand the molecular processes required for virus replication in the nucleus, much less is known about the temporal and spatial dynamics of these events. Previous studies have suggested that nuclear capsid motility is directed and dependent on actin filaments (F-actin), possibly using a myosin-based, ATP-dependent mechanism. However, the conclusions from these studies were indirect. They either relied on the effects of F-actin depolymerizing drugs to deduce an F-actin dependency or they visualized nuclear F-actin but failed to show a direct link to capsid motility. Moreover, no direct link between nuclear capsid motility and a molecular motor has been established. In this report, we reinvestigate the involvement of F-actin in nuclear herpesvirus capsid transport. We show for representative members of all three herpesvirus subfamilies that nuclear capsid motility is not dependent on nuclear F-actin and that herpesvirus infection does not induce nuclear F-actin in primary fibroblasts. Moreover, in these cells, three F-actin-inhibiting drugs failed to effect capsid motility. Only latrunculin A treatment stalled nuclear capsids but did so by an unexpected effect: the drug induced actin rods in the nucleus. Immobile capsids accumulated around actin rods, and immunoprecipitation experiments suggested that capsid motility stopped because latrunculin-induced actin rods nonspecifically bind nuclear capsids. Interestingly, capsid motility was unaffected in cells that do not induce actin rods. Based on these data, we conclude that herpesvirus nuclear capsid motility is not dependent on F-actin. Importance: Herpesviruses are large DNA viruses whose replication is dependent on the host nucleus. However, we do not understand how key nuclear processes, including capsid assembly, genome replication, capsid packaging, and nuclear egress, are dynamically connected in space and time. Fluorescence live-cell microscopy revealed that nuclear capsids are highly mobile early in infection. Two studies suggested that this motility might be due to active myosin-based transport of capsids on nuclear F-actin. However, direct evidence for such motor-based transport is lacking. We revisited this phenomenon and found no evidence that nuclear capsid motility depended on F-actin. Our results reopen the question of how nuclear herpesvirus capsids move in the host nucleus.
疱疹病毒生命周期的相当一部分发生在宿主细胞核内。虽然在理解病毒在细胞核内复制所需的分子过程方面已经取得了很大进展,但对于这些事件的时空动态却知之甚少。先前的研究表明,核衣壳运动是有方向的,并且依赖于肌动蛋白丝(F-肌动蛋白),可能使用基于肌球蛋白的、ATP依赖的机制。然而,这些研究的结论是间接的。它们要么依赖于F-肌动蛋白解聚药物的作用来推断F-肌动蛋白的依赖性,要么观察到了核内F-肌动蛋白,但未能显示出与衣壳运动的直接联系。此外,尚未建立核衣壳运动与分子马达之间的直接联系。在本报告中,我们重新研究了F-肌动蛋白在核内疱疹病毒衣壳运输中的作用。我们发现,对于所有三个疱疹病毒亚科的代表性成员来说,核衣壳运动不依赖于核内F-肌动蛋白,并且疱疹病毒感染不会在原代成纤维细胞中诱导核内F-肌动蛋白。此外,在这些细胞中,三种抑制F-肌动蛋白的药物未能影响衣壳运动。只有Latrunculin A处理使核衣壳停滞,但却是通过一种意想不到的效应:该药物在细胞核内诱导形成肌动蛋白棒。不动的衣壳聚集在肌动蛋白棒周围,免疫沉淀实验表明衣壳运动停止是因为Latrunculin诱导的肌动蛋白棒非特异性结合核衣壳。有趣的是,在不诱导肌动蛋白棒的细胞中,衣壳运动不受影响。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,疱疹病毒核衣壳运动不依赖于F-肌动蛋白。重要性:疱疹病毒是大型DNA病毒,其复制依赖于宿主细胞核。然而,我们并不了解关键的核过程,包括衣壳组装、基因组复制、衣壳包装和核输出,是如何在时空上动态连接的。荧光活细胞显微镜观察显示,感染早期核衣壳高度移动。两项研究表明这种运动可能是由于基于肌球蛋白对核内F-肌动蛋白上的衣壳进行主动运输。然而,缺乏这种基于马达运输的直接证据。我们重新审视了这一现象,没有发现核衣壳运动依赖于F-肌动蛋白的证据。我们的结果重新开启了疱疹病毒核衣壳如何在宿主细胞核内移动的问题。