Dhingra Rajan, Srivastava Saurabh, Behra Sanatan, Vadiraj Padmaprakash Kodavoor, Venuthurimilli Arun, Dash Nihar Ranjan, Madhusudhan Kumble Seetharama, Gamanagatti Shivanand Ramachandra, Garg Pramod Kumar
Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb;81(2):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.060. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a dreaded adverse event of acute pancreatitis (AP). Most patients with IPN require drainage and necrosectomy, preferably by a minimally invasive method.
To study the success and safety of an alternative form of minimally invasive necrosectomy for IPN.
Observational study.
Tertiary care academic center.
Consecutive patients with IPN formed the study group.
Patients with IPN were initially treated conservatively including percutaneous drainage. Those who failed to improve underwent percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy (PEN). Single- or multiport PEN was performed by using a flexible endoscope through the percutaneous tract. PEN involved vigorous lavage and suction followed by necrosectomy. Multiple sessions were undertaken depending on the size and number of collections and the amount of necrotic debris.
Control of sepsis and resolution of collection(s) without the need for surgical necrosectomy.
During the period from October 2012 to July 2013, 165 patients (mean age, 38.82 ± 14.99 years; 119 male patients) were studied. Of them, 103 patients had necrotizing pancreatitis and IPN had developed in 74. Of these 74 patients with IPN, 15 underwent PEN after a mean interval of 39.2 days. Fourteen of the 15 patients improved after a mean of 5 sessions of PEN. Two of 15 patients had minor adverse events: self-limiting bleeding and pancreatic fistula in 1 patient each. One patient required surgery but died of organ failure.
Lack of a control arm.
PEN is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for necrosectomy for IPN.
感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)是急性胰腺炎(AP)可怕的不良事件。大多数IPN患者需要引流和坏死组织清除术,最好采用微创方法。
研究IPN另一种微创坏死组织清除术的成功率和安全性。
观察性研究。
三级医疗学术中心。
连续的IPN患者组成研究组。
IPN患者最初接受包括经皮引流在内的保守治疗。病情未改善的患者接受经皮内镜坏死组织清除术(PEN)。通过经皮通道使用软性内镜进行单通道或多通道PEN。PEN包括强力灌洗和吸引,随后进行坏死组织清除术。根据积液的大小和数量以及坏死碎片的量进行多次手术。
控制脓毒症且无需手术坏死组织清除术即可使积液消退。
在2012年10月至2013年7月期间,研究了165例患者(平均年龄38.82±14.99岁;男性患者119例)。其中,103例患者患有坏死性胰腺炎,74例发展为IPN。在这74例IPN患者中,15例在平均39.2天的间隔后接受了PEN。15例患者中有14例在平均进行5次PEN后病情改善。15例患者中有2例出现轻微不良事件:1例患者出现自限性出血和胰瘘。1例患者需要手术,但死于器官衰竭。
缺乏对照组。
PEN是一种用于IPN坏死组织清除术的安全有效的微创技术。