Han Sheng-Bo, Chen Ding, Chen Qing-Yong, Hu Ping, Zheng Hai, Chen Jin-Huang, Xu Peng, Wang Chun-You, Zhao Gang
Department of Emergency Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(4):274-282. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.058.
The surgical step-up approach often requires multiple debridements and might not be suitable for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) patients with various abscesses or no safe route for percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD). This case-control study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of one-step laparoscopic pancreatic necrosectomy (LPN) in treating IPN.
This case-control study included IPN patients undergoing one-step LPN or surgical step-up in our center from January 2015 to December 2020. The short-term and long-term complications after surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative ICU stays in both groups were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the risk factors of major complications or death.
A total of 53 IPN patients underwent one-step LPN and 37 IPN patients underwent surgical step-up approach in this study. There was no significant difference in the incidence of death, major complications, new-onset diabetes, or new-onset pancreatic exocrine insufficiency between the two groups. However, the length of hospital stay in the one-step LPN group was significantly shorter than that in the surgical step-up group. Univariate regression analysis showed that the surgical approach (one-step/step-up) was not the risk factor for major complications or death. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that computed tomography (CT) severity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class IV, and white blood cell (WBC) were the significant risk factors for major complications or death.
One-step LPN is as safe and effective as the surgical step-up approach for treating IPN patients, and reduces total hospital stay.
外科逐步升级治疗方法通常需要多次清创,可能不适用于伴有各种脓肿或无经皮导管引流(PCD)安全路径的感染性胰腺坏死(IPN)患者。本病例对照研究旨在探讨一期腹腔镜胰腺坏死清创术(LPN)治疗IPN的安全性和有效性。
本病例对照研究纳入了2015年1月至2020年12月在本中心接受一期LPN或外科逐步升级治疗的IPN患者。分析了两组术后的短期和长期并发症、住院时间及术后重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以探讨主要并发症或死亡的危险因素。
本研究中共有53例IPN患者接受了一期LPN,37例IPN患者接受了外科逐步升级治疗方法。两组在死亡率、主要并发症、新发糖尿病或新发胰腺外分泌功能不全的发生率方面无显著差异。然而,一期LPN组的住院时间明显短于外科逐步升级治疗组。单因素回归分析显示手术方式(一期/逐步升级)不是主要并发症或死亡的危险因素。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,计算机断层扫描(CT)严重程度指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)IV级和白细胞(WBC)是主要并发症或死亡的显著危险因素。
一期LPN治疗IPN患者与外科逐步升级治疗方法一样安全有效,并可缩短总住院时间。