Suppr超能文献

通过初级保健开处体力活动处方:活动强度重要吗?

Prescribing physical activity through primary care: does activity intensity matter?

机构信息

Lawson Health Research Institute, Aging, Rehabilitation, and Geriatric Care Research Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Sep;42(3):78-89. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.09.2079.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical activity guidelines recommend engaging in moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity to elicit health benefits. Similarly, these higher intensity ranges for activity are typically targeted in healthy living interventions (ie, exercise prescription). Comparatively less attention has been focused on changing lower intensity physical activity (ie, sedentary activity) behaviors. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of prescribing changes to physical activity of various intensities (ie, sedentary through exercise) through the primary care setting.

METHODS

Sixty older adults (aged 55-75 years; mean age 63 = 5 years) volunteered to participate, and were randomly assigned to 4 groups: 3 receiving an activity prescription intervention targeting a specific intensity of physical activity (exercise, sedentary, or both), and 1 control group. During the 12-week intervention period participants followed personalized activity programs at home. Basic clinical measures (anthropometrics, blood pressure, aerobic fitness) and blood panel for assessing cardiometabolic risk (glucose, lipid profile) were conducted at baseline (week 0) and follow-up (week 12) in a primary care office.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups at baseline (P > 0.05). The intervention changed clinical (F₅,₅₀ = 20.458, P = 0.000, ηP² = 0.672) and blood panel measures (F₅,₅₀ = 4.576, P = 0.002, ηP² = 0.314) of cardiometabolic health. Post hoc analyses indicted no differences between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Physical activity prescription of various intensities through the primary care setting improved cardiometabolic health status. To our knowledge, this is the first report of sedentary behavior prescription (alone, or combined with exercise) in primary care. The findings support the ongoing practice of fitness assessment and physical activity prescription for chronic disease management and prevention.

摘要

背景

身体活动指南建议进行中等强度和高强度身体活动,以获得健康益处。同样,这些更高强度的活动范围通常是健康生活干预的目标(即运动处方)。相比之下,对改变低强度身体活动(即久坐活动)行为的关注较少。本研究的目的是探讨通过初级保健环境改变各种强度身体活动(即从久坐到运动)的效果。

方法

60 名年龄在 55-75 岁(平均年龄 63 = 5 岁)的老年人自愿参加,并随机分为 4 组:3 组接受针对特定强度身体活动(运动、久坐或两者兼有)的活动处方干预,1 组为对照组。在 12 周的干预期间,参与者在家中遵循个性化的活动计划。在初级保健办公室,在基线(第 0 周)和随访(第 12 周)时进行基本临床测量(人体测量、血压、有氧健身)和评估心血管代谢风险的血液检查(血糖、血脂谱)。

结果

组间基线无差异(P > 0.05)。干预改变了临床(F₅,₅₀ = 20.458,P = 0.000,ηP² = 0.672)和血液检查(F₅,₅₀ = 4.576,P = 0.002,ηP² = 0.314)的心血管代谢健康指标。事后分析表明组间无差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

通过初级保健环境进行各种强度的身体活动处方可改善心血管代谢健康状况。据我们所知,这是首次在初级保健中报告久坐行为处方(单独或与运动相结合)。研究结果支持目前对健身评估和身体活动处方的应用,以进行慢性病管理和预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验