Suppr超能文献

使用结合多普勒超声心动图和热稀释法的混合方法对低梯度严重主动脉瓣狭窄进行定量分析。

Quantification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis using a hybrid approach combining Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution.

作者信息

Unger Philippe, Dedobbeleer Chantal, Stoupel Eric, Preumont Nicolas, Argacha Jean-François, Berkenboom Guy, Van Camp Guy

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 2014 May;23(3):271-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Estimation of stroke volume in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) is a main limitation to aortic valve area (AVA) calculation by echocardiography when using the continuity equation. In this study, the hypothesis was tested that a hybrid method using thermodilution-derived cardiac output measurement and simultaneous Doppler estimation of the systolic ejection period and transvalvular aortic velocities could be used to accurately assess AVA in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (AS).

METHODS

Eighteen patients with low mean gradient (< 40 mmHg) and nine patients with conventionally defined (> or = 40 mmHg) severe AS (< 1 cm2), as assessed by the echocardiographic continuity equation (baseline echocardiography), underwent catheterization and simultaneous Doppler recording of trans-aortic velocities.

RESULTS

The mean pressure gradient was slightly lower by Doppler in the catheterization laboratory (35.8 +/-15.7 mmHg) compared to baseline echocardiography (37.4 +/- 15.2 mmHg) and invasive (38.5 +/- 16.6 mmHg) measurements (both p < 0.05). The AVA values were 0.72 +/- 0.12 cm2 during baseline echocardiography, 0.74 +/- 0.14 cm2 by catheterization, and 0.71 +/- 0.14 cm2 by the hybrid method (bias -0.01 +/- 0.11 cm2 and -0.02 +/- 0.08 cm2, versus echocardiography and catheterization, respectively; both p = NS).

CONCLUSION

The hybrid method is reasonably accurate in assessing AVA in patients with low-gradient severe AS. Although the continuity equation should be used in routine clinical practice in most patients, this method could serve as an alternative when the LVOT diameter and/or velocities seem questionable.

摘要

研究背景与目的

在使用连续性方程通过超声心动图计算主动脉瓣面积(AVA)时,左心室流出道(LVOT)每搏输出量的估算成为一个主要限制因素。本研究检验了这样一个假设:采用热稀释法测量心输出量,并同时利用多普勒估算收缩期射血时间和跨瓣主动脉流速的混合方法,可用于准确评估低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的AVA。

方法

通过超声心动图连续性方程评估(基线超声心动图),18例平均梯度较低(<40 mmHg)的患者和9例传统定义的(≥40 mmHg)重度AS(<1 cm²)患者接受了心导管检查,并同时进行了经主动脉流速的多普勒记录。

结果

与基线超声心动图(37.4±15.2 mmHg)和有创测量(38.5±16.6 mmHg)相比,导管实验室中通过多普勒测得的平均压力梯度略低(35.8±15.7 mmHg)(p均<0.05)。基线超声心动图检查时AVA值为0.72±0.12 cm²,心导管检查时为0.74±0.14 cm²,混合方法测量时为0.71±0.14 cm²(与超声心动图和心导管检查相比,偏差分别为-0.01±0.11 cm²和-0.02±0.08 cm²;p均=无显著性差异)。

结论

混合方法在评估低梯度重度AS患者的AVA方面具有合理的准确性。尽管在大多数患者的常规临床实践中应使用连续性方程,但当LVOT直径和/或流速存在疑问时,该方法可作为一种替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验