• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[经食管超声心动图多平面探头在主动脉瓣狭窄和关闭不全患者中平面测定主动脉瓣面积。与经胸多普勒超声心动图的比较]

[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].

作者信息

Morelli S, De Castro S, Cartoni D, Perrone C, Beni S, Bernardo M L, Ferrante L, Giordano M

机构信息

Istituto Di I Clinica Medica, Università La Sapienza, Roma.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Jul;25(7):851-7.

PMID:7557034
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The simple determination of transaortic pressure gradient does not accurately assess the severity of an aortic valve stenosis. Thus, estimating the aortic valve area (AVA) is vital for clinical decision-making. Cardiac catheterization has been considered the "gold-standard" for the quantification of the stenotic valve area, but this technique may underestimate the actual valve area when aortic regurgitation is associated. Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the continuity equation method is usually employed for AVA estimation. Recently, in pure aortic stenosis, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has provided AVA values well-correlated to hemodynamic invasive results.

METHODS

In this study, we correlated AVA values by TTE and multiplane TEE in 18 patients with combined aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation.

RESULTS

The mean values of AVA by TEE and TTE were 0.74 +/- 0.12 and 0.68 +/- 0.55 cm2, respectively (p = NS). TEE-derived AVA correlated well to TTE-derived AVA (r = 0.816; p < 0.0001). Critical aortic stenosis was predicted by TEE with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Total time of examination was significantly longer for TTE (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, direct planimetry by multiplane TEE is a reliable method for AVA determination in aortic stenoinsufficiency. For this purpose, when the technical quality of TTE study is poor or when the patient is critically ill and does not tolerate a longer lasting TTE, multiplane TEE should be considered.

摘要

背景

单纯测定跨主动脉压力阶差并不能准确评估主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。因此,估算主动脉瓣面积(AVA)对于临床决策至关重要。心导管检查一直被视为量化狭窄瓣膜面积的“金标准”,但当合并主动脉反流时,该技术可能会低估实际瓣膜面积。采用连续方程法的经胸多普勒超声心动图(TTE)通常用于AVA估算。最近,在单纯主动脉狭窄中,经食管超声心动图(TEE)所提供的AVA值与血流动力学侵入性检查结果具有良好的相关性。

方法

在本研究中,我们对18例合并主动脉瓣狭窄和反流患者的TTE和多平面TEE所测AVA值进行了相关性分析。

结果

TEE和TTE所测AVA的平均值分别为0.74±0.12和0.68±0.55cm²(p=无显著性差异)。TEE所测AVA与TTE所测AVA具有良好的相关性(r=0.816;p<0.0001)。TEE预测重度主动脉狭窄的敏感性和特异性均为100%。TTE的总检查时间明显更长(p<0.00001)。

结论

总之,多平面TEE直接测量法是测定主动脉狭窄伴反流患者AVA的可靠方法。为此,当TTE检查的技术质量较差或患者病情危重且无法耐受长时间的TTE检查时,应考虑采用多平面TEE。

相似文献

1
[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].[经食管超声心动图多平面探头在主动脉瓣狭窄和关闭不全患者中平面测定主动脉瓣面积。与经胸多普勒超声心动图的比较]
G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Jul;25(7):851-7.
2
Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.利用心脏磁共振断层扫描评估主动脉瓣狭窄时的主动脉瓣面积:与超声心动图的比较
Cardiology. 2008;109(2):126-34. doi: 10.1159/000105554. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
3
Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis.二维经食管超声心动图测定成人主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣面积
Am Heart J. 1991 Nov;122(5):1415-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90585-6.
4
Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.利用平均压差和主动脉瓣面积对主动脉瓣狭窄进行分级:术前经胸超声心动图与体外循环前经食管超声心动图的比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1254-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 11.
5
Quantitation of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with monoplane transesophageal approach.多平面经食管超声心动图定量评估主动脉瓣狭窄时的主动脉瓣面积:与单平面经食管方法的比较
Am Heart J. 1994 Sep;128(3):526-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90627-0.
6
Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.主动脉瓣面积评估:多层螺旋CT与电影磁共振成像及经胸和经食管超声心动图的比较
Radiology. 2007 Sep;244(3):745-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2443061127. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
7
Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination.射血分数和瓣膜反流对主动脉瓣面积测定准确性的影响。
Echocardiography. 2001 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2001.00065.x.
8
Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.二维超声心动图与三维超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄患者左心室流出道形态及主动脉瓣口面积的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 1;109(11):1626-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.391. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
9
Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.主动脉瓣狭窄的定量分析:64层螺旋计算机断层扫描与经食管和经胸超声心动图及心导管检查的直接比较
Invest Radiol. 2009 Jan;44(1):7-14. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31818f769b.
10
Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.双平面模式下实时三维超声心动图与二维经胸和经食管超声心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄时主动脉瓣面积准确性的比较。
Echocardiography. 2007 Nov;24(10):1065-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00526.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Challenges in Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄的诊断挑战
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 May 23;11(6):162. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11060162.