• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:对外科医生进行高级腹腔镜手术培训。

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Educating surgeons about advanced laparoscopic surgery.

作者信息

Nakamura Yoshiharu, Matsushita Akira, Katsuno Akira, Sumiyoshi Hiroki, Yoshioka Masato, Shimizu Tetsuya, Mizuguchi Yoshiaki, Uchida Eiji

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Nov;7(4):295-300. doi: 10.1111/ases.12131. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12131
PMID:25296944
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) has been recognized worldwide as a feasible and highly beneficial procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate whether Lap-DP techniques are being implemented safely by surgeons training to perform this procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the perioperative outcomes of Lap-DP in patients operated on by the surgeon originating this procedure at our hospital (expert surgeon group [E group], n = 47) and patients operated on by surgeons training to perform this procedure (training surgeons group [T group], n = 53).

RESULTS

The median operating times for the E group and T group were 321 min (range, 150-653 min) and 314 min (range, 173-629 min), respectively; these times were not significantly different (P = 0.4769). The median blood loss in the T group (100 mL; range, 0-1950 mL) was significantly smaller than in the E group (280 mL; range, 0-1920 mL) (P = 0.0003). There were no significant intergroup differences in other operative results: combined operation ratio, spleen- and splenic vessels-preserving ratio, hand-assisted procedure ratio, and the ratio of transition to open. The frequency of pancreatic fistulas in the E group and T group was 12.8% and 16.9%, respectively; these rates were not significantly different (P = 0.5886). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of other complications and reoperation rates. The median hospital stay for the E group was significantly shorter than for the T group (10 vs 13 days; P = 0.0307).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis shows that teaching safe Lap-DP techniques to surgeons is reflected in stable perioperative outcomes.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(Lap-DP)在全球范围内已被公认为是一种可行且极具益处的手术。本研究的目的是调查接受该手术培训的外科医生是否能安全地实施Lap-DP技术。

方法

我们回顾性比较了在我院开展该手术的外科医生(专家外科医生组[E组],n = 47)和接受该手术培训的外科医生(培训外科医生组[T组],n = 53)所实施的Lap-DP患者的围手术期结果。

结果

E组和T组的中位手术时间分别为321分钟(范围150 - 653分钟)和314分钟(范围173 - 629分钟);这些时间无显著差异(P = 0.4769)。T组的中位失血量(100毫升;范围0 - 1950毫升)显著低于E组(280毫升;范围0 - 1920毫升)(P = 0.0003)。其他手术结果在组间无显著差异:联合手术率、保留脾脏和脾血管率、手辅助手术率以及转为开放手术的比例。E组和T组胰瘘的发生率分别为12.8%和16.9%;这些发生率无显著差异(P = 0.5886)。两组在其他并发症和再次手术率方面无显著差异。E组的中位住院时间显著短于T组(10天对13天;P = 0.0307)。

结论

这项回顾性分析表明,向外科医生传授安全的Lap-DP技术体现在稳定的围手术期结果中。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: Educating surgeons about advanced laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术:对外科医生进行高级腹腔镜手术培训。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Nov;7(4):295-300. doi: 10.1111/ases.12131. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
2
Clinical outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的临床结果
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(1):35-41. doi: 10.1007/s00534-008-0007-0. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
3
Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel preservation: the role of the Warshaw procedure.保留脾脏的腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术伴或不伴脾血管保留:Warshaw手术的作用
Pancreatology. 2014 Nov-Dec;14(6):530-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
4
A single-center experience with the laparoscopic Warshaw technique in 122 consecutive patients.122例连续患者行腹腔镜Warshaw技术的单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4057-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4720-x. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
5
A nationwide comparison of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗良恶性疾病的全国性比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Mar;220(3):263-270.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
6
Clinical outcomes for 14 consecutive patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasms who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.14例接受腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的实性假乳头状肿瘤患者的临床结局。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 Feb;9(1):32-6. doi: 10.1111/ases.12256. Epub 2015 Nov 15.
7
Multicenter comparative study of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy using propensity score-matching.使用倾向评分匹配法对腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术的多中心比较研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):731-6. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.268. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
8
Total laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: beyond selected patients.全腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:超越特定患者群体
Am Surg. 2011 Nov;77(11):1526-30.
9
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
10
Lateral approach in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is safe and potentially beneficial compared to the traditional medial approach.与传统的内侧入路相比,腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的外侧入路是安全的,且可能具有益处。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2825-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3997-5. Epub 2014 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of difficulty in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A modification of the Japanese difficulty scoring system - A single-center high-volume experience.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术难度评估:日本难度评分系统的改良-单中心大宗病例经验。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Sep;28(9):770-777. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1010. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
2
Implementation and training with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: 23-year experience from a high-volume center.腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的实施和培训:来自大容量中心的 23 年经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):468-479. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08306-3. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.
胃滚压技术的优越入路可改善术中结果,并有助于学习腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:上入路与下入路的对比研究。
Surg Today. 2020 Feb;50(2):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01855-0. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
4
Study on laparoscopic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy procedures comparing splenic vessel preservation and non-preservation.比较保留脾血管与不保留脾血管的腹腔镜保留脾脏远端胰腺切除术的研究
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr 6;1:27. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.24. eCollection 2016.