Steenburg Scott D, Petersen Matthew J, Shen Changyu, Lin Hongbo
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital, 1701 N. Senate Blvd, Room AG-176, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA,
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Jun;40(5):1026-33. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0262-2.
The objective of this study is to determine which imaging features of blunt mesenteric injuries best predict the presence of a bowel injury requiring surgical correction.
The radiology archives at a Level 1 trauma center were searched over a 5-year period to identify patients with mesenteric injuries seen on admission 64 slice MDCT. Two emergency radiologists, blinded to clinical and surgical outcomes, retrospectively recorded mesenteric injury size, the presence/absence of active mesenteric bleeding, bowel wall thickening, adjacent interloop free fluid, extraluminal gas, mesenteric vessel termination, mesenteric vessel "beading", focal bowel wall defect, and bowel wall perfusion abnormality. Based on all of the imaging findings, the radiologists were asked to determine if they thought the patient had a surgical bowel injury.
One hundred twenty-six patients with mesenteric injuries were identified. Eighteen patients underwent laparotomy confirming the presence of bowel injury in 15. The remaining patients were successfully managed non-operatively. There was no statistically significant difference in size of mesenteric injury for surgical vs. non-surgical bowel injuries. Active bleeding, adjacent interloop free fluid, and bowel wall perfusion defects were strong predictors of the presence of a surgically significant bowel injury (p < 0.001, 0.002, and 0.020, respectively). The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 64-MDCT were 73.8%, 80%, 73.0%, 28.6%, and 96.4%, respectively.
Mesenteric active bleeding, adjacent interloop free fluid and bowel wall perfusion defects are associated with surgically significant bowel injuries. The diagnosis of surgical bowel injuries remains challenging despite 64-slice MDCT technology.
本研究的目的是确定钝性肠系膜损伤的哪些影像学特征最能预测需要手术矫正的肠损伤的存在。
在一家一级创伤中心的放射学档案中进行了为期5年的检索,以识别入院时经64层MDCT检查发现有肠系膜损伤的患者。两名急诊放射科医生在不知道临床和手术结果的情况下,回顾性记录肠系膜损伤大小、是否存在活动性肠系膜出血、肠壁增厚、肠袢间游离液体、肠腔外气体、肠系膜血管中断、肠系膜血管“串珠样改变”、局限性肠壁缺损以及肠壁灌注异常。根据所有影像学检查结果,要求放射科医生确定他们是否认为患者存在手术性肠损伤。
共识别出126例肠系膜损伤患者。18例患者接受了剖腹手术,其中15例证实存在肠损伤。其余患者通过非手术治疗成功治愈。手术性与非手术性肠损伤的肠系膜损伤大小在统计学上无显著差异。活动性出血、相邻肠袢间游离液体和肠壁灌注缺损是手术上有意义的肠损伤存在的强有力预测指标(分别为p<0.001、0.002和0.020)。64层MDCT的总体准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为73.8%、80%、73.0%、28.6%和96.4%。
肠系膜活动性出血、相邻肠袢间游离液体和肠壁灌注缺损与手术上有意义的肠损伤相关。尽管有64层MDCT技术,手术性肠损伤的诊断仍然具有挑战性。