Suppr超能文献

液基细胞学在甲状腺结节评估中的应用

Liquid base cytology in evaluation of thyroid nodules.

作者信息

Keyhani Elahe, Sharghi Sasan A, Amini Rana, Sharghi Sina A, Karimlou Masoud, Moghaddam Fatemeh A, Larijani Bagher

机构信息

Genetics Research Center-University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Koudakyar st.-Daneshjoo blv., Tehran, (1985713834) Iran.

Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, (1411413137) Iran.

出版信息

J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014 Sep 10;13(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40200-014-0082-5. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palpable thyroid nodules are present in 4-7% of general population and Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) is now accepted by endocrinologists and thyroid surgeons as a safe, simple and cost effective procedure for evaluating a thyroid nodule. The obtained sample can be spread directly on slides, processed as cell block preparations or prepared as liquid base smears. Liquid base method has been recently accepted due to its shorter preparation time and better preservation of nuclear details. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic results of two commonly used methods: Liquid Base Preparation and Cell Block Preparation in evaluation of thyroid nodules.

METHODS

The samples were taken from 100 patients with a solitary nodule or a prominent nodule on a multinodular goiter background (excluding hot nodules). The obtained samples were used to prepare conventional smears (CS), Cell Block Preparations (CBP) and Liquid Base Preparations (LBP). The slides were studied by two pathologists, considering the following parameters: Cellularity, Colloid, Lymphocytes/Plasma cells and Macrophages.

RESULTS

87% of cases revealed informative results in LBP method while in the same group of patients only 69% of samples were informative after processing by CBP method. Sensitivity and specificity of both methods compared with the conventional smears and with each other and it is concluded that LBP is a reliable method for evaluating of a thyroid nodule. Other studies also show the same results.

CONCLUSION

The liquid base method should be trusted due to its easier procedure, cleaner slide background, its higher specificity and higher diagnostic yields. It can be used instead of CBP and in association with CS to increase the accuracy of evaluation of thyroid nodules.

摘要

背景

普通人群中4% - 7%可触及甲状腺结节,细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)目前已被内分泌学家和甲状腺外科医生认可,是一种评估甲状腺结节安全、简单且经济高效的方法。获取的样本可直接涂片于载玻片上,制成细胞块标本或液基涂片。液基方法因其制备时间短且能更好地保存细胞核细节,最近已被广泛接受。本研究旨在比较两种常用方法:液基制片法和细胞块制片法在评估甲状腺结节中的诊断结果。

方法

样本取自100例单发结节或多结节性甲状腺肿背景下突出结节的患者(不包括热结节)。获取的样本用于制备传统涂片(CS)、细胞块标本(CBP)和液基标本(LBP)。两名病理学家对载玻片进行研究,考虑以下参数:细胞数量、胶质、淋巴细胞/浆细胞和巨噬细胞。

结果

87%的病例在LBP方法中显示出有诊断价值的结果,而在同一组患者中,经CBP方法处理后只有69%的样本具有诊断价值。将两种方法与传统涂片相互比较其敏感性和特异性,得出LBP是评估甲状腺结节的可靠方法。其他研究也显示了相同的结果。

结论

液基方法因其操作更简便、玻片背景更干净、特异性更高和诊断率更高而值得信赖。它可替代CBP并与CS联合使用,以提高甲状腺结节评估的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/4189558/ff94c2c6a42f/40200_2014_82_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验