Pandey Sanjay, Rathore Chaturbhuj, Michael Benedict D
Department of Neurology, G.B. Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India, 110002.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 9(10):CD010247. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010247.pub2.
Viral encephalitis is characterised by diverse clinical and epidemiological features. Seizures are an important clinical manifestation and associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Patients may have seizures during the acute illness or they may develop after recovery. There are no recommendations regarding the use of antiepileptic drugs for the primary or secondary prevention of seizures in patients with viral encephalitis.
To assess the efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs for the primary and secondary prophylaxis of seizures in viral encephalitis. We intended to answer the following questions.1. Do antiepileptic drugs used as primary prophylaxis routinely for all patients with suspected or proven viral encephalitis reduce the risk of seizures during the acute illness and reduce neurological morbidity and mortality?2. Do antiepileptic drugs used as secondary prophylaxis routinely for all patients who have had at least one seizure due to suspected or proven viral encephalitis reduce the risk of further seizures during the acute illness and reduce neurological morbidity and mortality?
We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (13 May 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2014, Issue 4) (April 2014), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 13 May 2014), the WHO ICTRP search portal (13 May 2014) and ClinicalTrials.gov (13 May 2014). We did not impose any language restrictions.
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in which patients were assigned to a treatment or control group (placebo or no drug).
One author (SP) searched the publications by title, abstract and keywords and decided on their suitability for inclusion in the review. For any studies where it was unclear whether they would be suitable for inclusion, the co-authors (CR, BM) were consulted. The co-authors (CR, BM) evaluated the selected studies independently. Since there were no included studies, we carried out no data analysis.
We did not find any randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the effects of antiepileptic drugs with placebo (or no drug) for the primary or secondary prevention of seizures in viral encephalitis. We identified two studies from the literature search where different antiepileptic drugs were used in patients with viral encephalitis, however both failed to meet the inclusion criteria. The first study included children with viral encephalitis where antiepileptic drugs were given. However, it is not clear how the diagnosis was established or the aetiologies. In addition, the randomisation and blinding method is not disclosed; the patients received a diverse and ill-defined range of antiepileptic drugs and adjunctive therapies, and none of the primary or secondary outcome measures was assessed. In the second study, adults with status epilepticus (of whom a proportion had viral encephalitis), who had failed to respond to two initial boluses of diazepam, were randomised to either valproate or diazepam. The study was open-label and the randomisation methodology was not disclosed; none of the primary or secondary outcomes were reported. Data on treatment response between the two arms for those patients with viral encephalitis are not presented for subgroup analysis; the Cochrane Epilepsy Group have contacted the authors for these data but have yet to receive a response.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of antiepileptic drugs for the primary or secondary prevention of seizures in viral encephalitis. There is a need for adequately powered randomised controlled trials in viral encephalitis patients to assess the efficacy and safety of antiepileptic drugs for the primary and secondary prophylaxis of seizures, which is an important clinical problem.
病毒性脑炎具有多样的临床和流行病学特征。癫痫发作是一种重要的临床表现,与死亡率和发病率增加相关。患者可能在急性疾病期间出现癫痫发作,也可能在康复后发生。对于病毒性脑炎患者癫痫发作的一级或二级预防,目前尚无关于使用抗癫痫药物的推荐。
评估抗癫痫药物在病毒性脑炎癫痫发作一级和二级预防中的疗效和安全性。我们旨在回答以下问题。1. 对于所有疑似或确诊的病毒性脑炎患者,常规使用抗癫痫药物进行一级预防是否能降低急性疾病期间癫痫发作的风险,并降低神经功能障碍及死亡率?2. 对于所有因疑似或确诊的病毒性脑炎至少发作过一次癫痫的患者,常规使用抗癫痫药物进行二级预防是否能降低急性疾病期间再次发作的风险,并降低神经功能障碍及死亡率?
我们检索了Cochrane癫痫专业组专门注册库(2014年5月13日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL 2014年第4期)(2014年4月)及MEDLINE(Ovid,1946年至2014年5月13日)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(2014年5月13日)及ClinicalTrials.gov(2014年5月13日)。我们未设任何语言限制。
随机和半随机对照试验,其中患者被分配至治疗组或对照组(安慰剂或无药物)。
一位作者(SP)通过标题、摘要和关键词检索出版物,并决定其是否适合纳入综述。对于任何不清楚是否适合纳入的研究,咨询共同作者(CR,BM)。共同作者(CR,BM)独立评估所选研究。由于未纳入任何研究,我们未进行数据分析。
我们未找到任何比较抗癫痫药物与安慰剂(或无药物)对病毒性脑炎癫痫发作一级或二级预防效果的随机或半随机对照试验。我们在文献检索中确定了两项研究,其中在病毒性脑炎患者中使用了不同的抗癫痫药物,但两项研究均未符合纳入标准。第一项研究纳入了接受抗癫痫药物治疗的病毒性脑炎儿童。然而,不清楚诊断是如何确立的或病因是什么。此外,随机化和盲法未披露;患者接受了多种定义不明确的抗癫痫药物和辅助治疗,且未评估任何一级或二级结局指标。在第二项研究中,如果成人癫痫持续状态患者(其中一部分患有病毒性脑炎)对两次初始剂量的地西泮无反应,将其随机分为丙戊酸盐组或地西泮组。该研究为开放标签,随机化方法未披露;未报告任何一级或二级结局。未提供病毒性脑炎患者两组间治疗反应的数据用于亚组分析;Cochrane癫痫专业组已联系作者获取这些数据,但尚未收到回复。
没有足够的证据支持在病毒性脑炎癫痫发作的一级或二级预防中常规使用抗癫痫药物。需要对病毒性脑炎患者进行有足够样本量的随机对照试验,以评估抗癫痫药物在癫痫发作一级和二级预防中的疗效和安全性,这是一个重要的临床问题。